Literature DB >> 16952198

Quantitative distribution of a panel of circulating mRNA in preeclampsia versus controls.

Antonio Farina1, Akihiko Sekizawa, Yuditiya Purwosunu, Nicola Rizzo, Irina Banzola, Manuela Concu, Danila Morano, Federica Giommi, Maurizio Bevini, Mohamad Mabrook, Paolo Carinci, Takashi Okai.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the quantitative distribution of a panel of circulating mRNAs from maternal whole blood of normal pregnancies is statistically different from those complicated with preeclampsia (PE) with or without intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR).
METHODS: Maternal whole blood of six subjects with mild or severe PE with or without IUGR and 30 matched controls (1:5 match for gestational age) were retrospectively examined for circulating mRNA markers. Seven specific mRNA markers were identified and chosen based on previous microarray mRNA expressions performed on placental tissue from normal and PE patients. They were human placental lactogen (hPL), inhibin A, KISS-1, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A), plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1), selectin-P and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), which were therefore quantified for statistical purposes.
RESULTS: Median gestational age was 229 (178-283) and 232 (194-262) days for controls and cases respectively. All mRNA markers but PAPP-A, showed statistically different median values. They were hPL, inhibin A, KISS-1, PAI-1, Selectin-P, and VEGFR. Inhibin A, Selectin-P and VEGFR showed higher values than expected for controls. Instead, hPL, KISS-1 and PAI-1 values of PE patients were lower than those of controls. Selectin-P was the marker with the most aberrant difference, followed by VEGFR and KISS-1.
CONCLUSION: This preliminary analysis revealed that the median values of a panel of mRNAs from the maternal blood of PE patients were different from those of the same gestational age control group at the third trimester. If prospective studies at the second trimester could detect a related marker sufficiently able to discriminate between affected and unaffected patients and thus detect the disease before its clinical onset, then a screening project using a panel of mRNAs would be feasible. 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16952198     DOI: 10.1002/pd.1562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  10 in total

Review 1.  Extracellular nucleic acids in maternal circulation as potential biomarkers for placental insufficiency.

Authors:  Ilona Hromadnikova
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.311

Review 2.  International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXVII. Kisspeptin receptor nomenclature, distribution, and function.

Authors:  Helen R Kirby; Janet J Maguire; William H Colledge; Anthony P Davenport
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 3.  The Role of Kisspeptin in the Pathogenesis of Pregnancy Complications: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Magdalena Szydełko-Gorzkowicz; Elżbieta Poniedziałek-Czajkowska; Radzisław Mierzyński; Maciej Sotowski; Bożena Leszczyńska-Gorzelak
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  Identification of messenger RNA of fetoplacental source in maternal plasma of women with normal pregnancies and pregnancies with intrauterine growth restriction.

Authors:  Paola Ayala Ramírez; Reggie García Robles; Juan Diego Rojas; Martha Bermúdez; Jaime Bernal
Journal:  Colomb Med (Cali)       Date:  2012-09-30

Review 5.  Kisspeptins: a multifunctional peptide system with a role in reproduction, cancer and the cardiovascular system.

Authors:  E J Mead; J J Maguire; R E Kuc; A P Davenport
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Inotropic action of the puberty hormone kisspeptin in rat, mouse and human: cardiovascular distribution and characteristics of the kisspeptin receptor.

Authors:  Janet J Maguire; Helen R Kirby; Emma J Mead; Rhoda E Kuc; Xavier d'Anglemont de Tassigny; William H Colledge; Anthony P Davenport
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cell free expression of hif1α and p21 in maternal peripheral blood as a marker for preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction.

Authors:  Osnat Ashur-Fabian; Gil M Yerushalmi; Shali Mazaki-Tovi; David M Steinberg; Inbal Goldshtein; Michal Yackobovitch-Gavan; Eyal Schiff; Ninette Amariglio; Gideon Rechavi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Circulating GATA2 mRNA is decreased among women destined to develop preeclampsia and may be of endothelial origin.

Authors:  Carole-Anne Whigham; Teresa M MacDonald; Susan P Walker; Natasha Pritchard; Natalie J Hannan; Ping Cannon; Tuong Vi Nguyen; Roxanne Hastie; Stephen Tong; Tu'uhevaha J Kaitu'u-Lino
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Inflammatory pattern recognition receptors and their ligands: factors contributing to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Sado; Katsuhiko Naruse; Taketoshi Noguchi; Shoji Haruta; Shozo Yoshida; Yasuhito Tanase; Takashi Kitanaka; Hidekazu Oi; Hiroshi Kobayashi
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 4.575

10.  The Role of RNAs and microRNAs in Non-Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis.

Authors:  Antonio Farina
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 4.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.