Literature DB >> 16951098

Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem. Surgical technique.

B Willem Schreurs1, J J Chris Arts, Nico Verdonschot, Pieter Buma, Tom J J H Slooff, Jean W M Gardeniers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision of the femoral component of a hip arthroplasty with use of an impaction bone-grafting technique and a cemented polished stem.
METHODS: Thirty-three consecutive femoral reconstructions that were performed between March 1991 and February 1996 with use of the X-change femoral revision system, fresh-frozen morselized allograft, and a cemented polished Exeter stem were followed prospectively. Femoral bone stock defects were classified according to the Endoklinik classification. The average age of the patients at the time of the femoral component revision was sixty-three years. No patient was lost to follow-up, which was performed at a minimum of eight years, but eight patients had died. None of the deaths was related to the surgery.
RESULTS: No femoral reconstruction had been rerevised at a mean of 10.4 years postoperatively. There was one unrecognized intraoperative fracture, which healed following nonoperative treatment. There were three postoperative femoral fractures, all through cortical defects at the level of the tip of the prostheses. All fractures healed after plate fixation, and all femoral implants were left in situ. The average subsidence of the stem within the cement mantle was 3 mm; seven stems migrated 5 mm. The average Harris hip score improved from 49 points prior to surgery to 85 points (range, 68 to 100 points) at the time of this review. Subsidence did not affect the Harris hip score. Kaplan-Meier analysis, with an end point of femoral revision for any reason, showed a survival rate of 100% (one-sided 95% confidence interval, 100% to 91.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: Femoral revision with use of an impaction bone-grafting technique and a cemented polished stem resulted in an excellent prosthetic survival rate at eight to thirteen years postoperatively. The major problem that occurred was a femoral fracture in four patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16951098     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  18 in total

1.  Initial stability of circumferential meshes with impacted bone allografts for massive femoral defects.

Authors:  Agustín José Guala; Martin Buttaro; Francisco Piccaluga
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Why revision total hip arthroplasty fails.

Authors:  Bryan D Springer; Thomas K Fehring; William L Griffin; Susan M Odum; John L Masonis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  [Bone allografting].

Authors:  B-D Katthagen; A Prub
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  [Influence of thermodisinfection on impaction of cancellous bone : An in vitro model of femoral impaction bone grafting].

Authors:  C Fölsch; A Jahnke; A Groß; G Martels; G A Krombach; M Rickert; M Kampschulte
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  [Allogeneic bone transplantation in hip revision surgery : Indications and potential for reconstruction].

Authors:  G A Ahmed; B Ishaque; M Rickert; C Fölsch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Cemented total hip arthroplasty revisions in patients of eighty years and older.

Authors:  Martijn A J te Stroet; Sushma A Ghisai; J Christiaan Keurentjes; Wim H C Rijnen; Jean W M Gardeniers; Albert Van Kampen; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Proximal femoral reconstructions with bone impaction grafting and metal mesh.

Authors:  Martín A Buttaro; Fernando Comba; Francisco Piccaluga
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The threshold force required for femoral impaction grafting in revision hip surgery.

Authors:  Olivia M Flannery; John R Britton; Peter O'Reilly; Nicholas Mahony; Patrick J Prendergast; Paddy J Kenny
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Impregnation of bone chips with antibiotics and storage of antibiotics at different temperatures: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Nina M C Mathijssen; Pieter L C Petit; Peter Pilot; B Wim Schreurs; Pieter Buma; Rolf M Bloem
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  [Revision arthroplasty of the hip: modularity of neck and metaphyseal components].

Authors:  G Köster; T A Walde
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.