Literature DB >> 16950415

An 8-year experience with type II endoleaks: natural history suggests selective intervention is a safe approach.

Daniel Silverberg1, Donald T Baril, Sharif H Ellozy, Alfio Carroccio, Savannah E Greyrose, Robert A Lookstein, Michael L Marin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The treatment of type II endoleaks remains controversial because little is known about their long-term natural history and impact on changes in aneurysm morphology. This study reviews type II endoleaks occurring in patients after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) at a single-institution over an 8-year period.
METHODS: All patients undergoing EVAR who had type II endoleaks documented on follow-up imaging studies at our institution between January 1997 and March 2005 were reviewed. Data regarding patient demographics in addition to aneurysm size, device type, operative complications, and secondary interventions were reviewed. Outcomes evaluated included the rate of spontaneous sealing, freedom from secondary intervention, and aneurysm enlargement, rupture, or conversion.
RESULTS: Type II endoleaks were present in 154 of 965 patients (16.0%) undergoing EVAR. Mean follow-up time was 22.0 months (range, 1 to 72 months). Fifty-five patients (35.7%) with type II endoleaks sealed spontaneously in a mean time of 14.5 months. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, approximately 75% of type II endoleaks sealed spontaneously within a 5-year period. Nineteen patients (12.3%) with type II endoleaks were treated at a mean time of 19.9 months at the operating surgeon's discretion, including 13 with sac enlargement >5 mm. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated that approximately 65% of the patients remained free of intervention after a period of 4 years. Thirteen patients (8.4%) experienced aneurysm sac enlargement >5 mm. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated that approximately 80% of patients with type II endoleaks remained free of sac enlargement >5 mm over a 4-year period. No patients with type II endoleaks experienced rupture or required conversion to open repair during their follow-up. Cox regression analysis showed that cancer, coronary artery disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were associated with earlier spontaneous closure of the type II endoleaks (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: We observed that type II endoleaks have a relatively benign course, and in the absence of sac expansion, can be followed for a prolonged course of time without the need for intervention. The rate of spontaneous seal continues to increase with time and, therefore, close follow-up of patients with type II endoleaks who show no signs of aneurysm expansion is a safe approach. For patients in whom the exact etiology of their endoleak is in question, dynamic imaging should be used to exclude the presence of a type I endoleak.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16950415     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.04.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  17 in total

Review 1.  Type II endoleaks: diagnosis and treatment algorithm.

Authors:  Yolanda Bryce; Brian Schiro; Kyle Cooper; Suvranu Ganguli; Mamdouh Khayat; Cuong Ken Lam; Rahmi Oklu; Geogy Vatakencherry; Ripal T Gandhi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-04

2.  Risk factors for a persistent type 2 endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Maeda; Toshiro Ito; Yoshihiko Kurimoto; Toshitaka Watanabe; Yohsuke Kuroda; Nobuyoshi Kawaharada; Tetsuya Higami
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Open treatment versus endovascular repair for aortic abdominal aneurysm-keeping the balance.

Authors:  Wtgj Bos; T Cohen; G Vourliotakis; Mrhm van Sambeek; Elg Verhoeven
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2009-12-14

4.  [Endoleaks - when is treatment necessary?].

Authors:  O Dudeck
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  Static sac size with a type II endoleak post-endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: surveillance or embolization?

Authors:  Kyriacos Patatas; Lynn Ling; Joel Dunning; Vivek Shrivastava
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-05-22

6.  CT Findings of Risk Factors for Persistent Type II Endoleak from Inferior Mesenteric Artery to Determine Indicators of Preoperative IMA Embolization.

Authors:  Tetsuya Fukuda; Hitoshi Matsuda; Yoshihiro Sanda; Yoshiaki Morita; Kenji Minatoya; Junjiro Kobayashi; Hiroaki Naito
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2014-08-30

7.  Management of Endoleaks following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

Authors:  Sarah B White; S William Stavropoulos
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.513

8.  Surgical Repair of a 13-cm Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Aortocaval Fistula in a 63-Year-Old Tuba Player.

Authors:  Macit Bitargil; Nilufer Bektas; Sinan Omeroglu; Ismail Koramaz
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2019-02-01

9.  Type II endoleak with or without intervention after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair does not change aneurysm-related outcomes despite sac growth.

Authors:  Joy Walker; Lue-Yen Tucker; Philip Goodney; Leah Candell; Hong Hua; Steven Okuhn; Bradley Hill; Robert W Chang
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Risk factors and consequences of persistent type II endoleaks.

Authors:  Ruby C Lo; Dominique B Buck; Jeremy Herrmann; Allen D Hamdan; Mark Wyers; Virendra I Patel; Mark Fillinger; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 4.268

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.