Literature DB >> 16950105

Expression profile of a degenerating neo-y chromosome in Drosophila.

Doris Bachtrog1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gene-poor, degenerate Y chromosomes have evolved repeatedly from ordinary autosomes, but little is known about the processes that silence most genes on an evolving Y.
RESULTS: Here, I quantify relative expression levels of 58 gene pairs on the recently formed neo-sex chromosomes of Drosophila miranda, in order to test competing models of gene inactivation on its newly evolving Y chromosome (the neo-Y). Although the neo-Y of D. miranda still contains the majority of its original genes, most exhibit an accelerated rate of protein evolution, and many contain frameshift or nonsense mutations. All but three of these genes show significantly different levels of expression from the neo-X and neo-Y chromosome, with approximately 80% of all genes being expressed at lower levels from the neo-Y. The downregulation of many genes on the neo-Y appears to occur randomly, regardless of the level of accumulation of amino acid substitutions or whether the gene produces a functional protein. In addition, adjacent genes show considerable heterogeneity in levels of gene expression, an observation that argues against chromatin-structure-mediated changes in gene expression levels.
CONCLUSIONS: My results suggest that transcriptional inactivation of degenerating Y linked genes is an accidental by-product of mutation accumulation, and not driven by selection to either maintain expression at functional loci or downregulate maladapted genes from the neo-Y. Thus, most mutations observed on the neo-Y are likely to have deleterious effects on fitness and accumulate as a result of the reduced efficiency of natural selection on a nonrecombining chromosome, rather than neutrally or adaptively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16950105     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  31 in total

1.  Evolution of amino-acid sequences and codon usage on the Drosophila miranda neo-sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Carolina Bartolomé; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  The repatterning of eukaryotic genomes by random genetic drift.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; Louis-Marie Bobay; Francesco Catania; Jean-François Gout; Mina Rho
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 8.929

Review 3.  Harnessing apomictic reproduction in grasses: what we have learned from Paspalum.

Authors:  Juan Pablo A Ortiz; Camilo L Quarin; Silvina C Pessino; Carlos Acuña; Eric J Martínez; Francisco Espinoza; Diego H Hojsgaard; Maria E Sartor; Maria E Cáceres; Fulvio Pupilli
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 4.  Evolution of sex chromosomes in insects.

Authors:  Vera B Kaiser; Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  Muller's ratchet and the degeneration of the Drosophila miranda neo-Y chromosome.

Authors:  Vera B Kaiser; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Y-chromosome evolution: emerging insights into processes of Y-chromosome degeneration.

Authors:  Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Elevated levels of expression associated with regions of the Drosophila genome that lack crossing over.

Authors:  Penelope R Haddrill; Fergal M Waldron; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  X chromosomal regulation in flies: when less is more.

Authors:  Erinc Hallacli; Asifa Akhtar
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Evolution and survival on eutherian sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Melissa A Wilson; Kateryna D Makova
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 10.  Progress and prospects toward our understanding of the evolution of dosage compensation.

Authors:  Beatriz Vicoso; Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.