Literature DB >> 16948671

Retention of resin-based pit and fissure sealants: A systematic review.

Michèle Muller-Bolla1, Laurence Lupi-Pégurier, Corinne Tardieu, Ana Miriam Velly, Constance Antomarchi.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review on the retention of resin-based sealants (RBSs) according to the material used and the clinical procedure. An electronic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library and SCOPUS was completed by a hand search in conference proceedings. One hundred and twenty-four studies were identified, 31 of which were included. The retention rate of auto-polymerized and light-cured RBSs did not differ significantly. Light-cured RBSs had a significantly higher retention rate than fluoride-containing light-cured RBSs at 48 months (RR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.72-0.89) and more. Concerning the clinical procedure, the scarcity of well-conducted studies made judgement difficult, except for the isolation stage. If using a rubber dam did not affect retention of auto-polymerized RBSs, it did for fluoride-containing light-cured RBSs (RR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.51-2.73).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16948671     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00319.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol        ISSN: 0301-5661            Impact factor:   3.383


  16 in total

Review 1.  Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rodrigo G de Amorim; Soraya C Leal; Jo E Frencken
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a one-step conditioning agent in fissure sealant placement: 12 month results.

Authors:  L Burbridge; Z Nugent; C Deery
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2007-03

3.  The success rates of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant placed by fifth-year undergraduate dental students.

Authors:  T Ulusu; M E Odabaş; T Tüzüner; O Baygin; H Sillelioğlu; C Deveci; F G Gökdoğan; A Altuntaş
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2012-04

4.  Retention rates and caries-preventive effects of two different sealant materials: a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Renata Nunes Cabral; Jorge Faber; Simone Auxiliadora Morais Otero; Leandro Augusto Hilgert; Soraya Coelho Leal
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Retention of fissure sealants using two different methods of application in teeth with hypomineralised molars (MIH): a 4 year clinical study.

Authors:  N A Lygidakis; G Dimou; E Stamataki
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2009-12

6.  Attitudes, knowledge and utilization of fissure sealants among Greek dentists: a national survey.

Authors:  M Michalaki; M Sifakaki; C J Oulis; N A Lygidakis
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2010-12

7.  A randomized control clinical trial of fissure sealant retention: Self etch adhesive versus total etch adhesive.

Authors:  Nadia Aman; Farhan Reza Khan; Aisha Salim; Huma Farid
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

8.  Retention loss of resin based fissure sealants - a valid predictor for clinical outcome?

Authors:  Steffen Mickenautsch; Veerasamy Yengopal
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2013-08-23

9.  Clinical evaluation of the retention of different pit and fissure sealants: a 1-year study.

Authors:  Parvathy Kumaran
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2013-10-14

10.  Comparison of intervention effects in split-mouth and parallel-arm randomized controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological study.

Authors:  Violaine Smaïl-Faugeron; Hélène Fron-Chabouis; Frédéric Courson; Pierre Durieux
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.