Literature DB >> 29524027

Retention rates and caries-preventive effects of two different sealant materials: a randomised clinical trial.

Renata Nunes Cabral1, Jorge Faber2, Simone Auxiliadora Morais Otero2, Leandro Augusto Hilgert2, Soraya Coelho Leal2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the caries-preventive effect and the retention rates of sealants prepared with a new modified and a high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (GIC) in recently erupted first permanent molars. 
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six children (224 teeth) were included in a split-mouth randomised clinical trial. All children had their four first permanent molars sealed with either Clinpro XT Varnish (CXT) or Fuji IX GP FAST (FJ). FJ sealants were placed according to the ART protocol. Retention rates and caries-preventive effect of both materials were assessed clinically after 24 months, and survival curves were created according to the Kaplan-Meier method. For sealant retention rates, analyses were performed according to both the traditional method and modified sealant retention categorisation.
RESULTS: FJ sealants were retained longer in comparison to CXT sealants (p < 0.05), regardless of the categorisation used. In relation to the caries-preventive effect, no statistically significant differences were observed between materials (p = 0.99). Sealants prepared with the high-viscosity GIC according to the ART protocol survived longer than those prepared with the modified GIC, but both materials were equally effective in preventing cavitated dentine lesions over 24 months.
CONCLUSION: We concluded that GIC-based sealants are effective in preventing dentine caries lesions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental sealant; Glass-ionomer cement; Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29524027     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2416-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  28 in total

1.  Caries-preventive effect of sealants produced with altered glass-ionomer materials, after 2 years.

Authors:  X Chen; M Q Du; M W Fan; J Mulder; M C D N J M Huysmans; J E Frencken
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Clinical comparison of Fuji VII and a resin sealant in children at high and low risk of caries.

Authors:  Xiao xian Chen; Xing gang Liu
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Dental caries status and treatment needs of 12-13-year-old children in Sichuan Province, southwestern China.

Authors:  E C Lo; C J Holmgren; D Y Hu; H C Wan
Journal:  Community Dent Health       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.349

4.  ART restorations and sealants placed in Chinese school children--results after three years.

Authors:  C J Holmgren; E C Lo; D Hu; H Wan
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.383

5.  Efficacy of a moisture-tolerant material for fissure sealing: a prospective randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  N Schlueter; J Klimek; C Ganss
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Caries-preventive efficacy and retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant: a 3-year split-mouth randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Wagner Baseggio; Fabiana Scarparo Naufel; Denise César de Oliveira Davidoff; Flávia Pardo Salata Nahsan; Simon Flury; Jonas Almeida Rodrigues
Journal:  Oral Health Prev Dent       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.256

Review 7.  Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents.

Authors:  Anneli Ahovuo-Saloranta; Anne Hiiri; Anne Nordblad; Marjukka Mäkelä; Helen V Worthington
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08

8.  Global burden of oral conditions in 1990-2010: a systematic analysis.

Authors:  W Marcenes; N J Kassebaum; E Bernabé; A Flaxman; M Naghavi; A Lopez; C J L Murray
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 6.116

9.  Effectiveness of two new types of sealants: retention after 2 years.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Minquan Du; Mingwen Fan; Jan Mulder; Marie-Charlotte Huysmans; Jo E Frencken
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 10.  Validity of sealant retention as surrogate for caries prevention--a systematic review.

Authors:  Steffen Mickenautsch; Veerasamy Yengopal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The Effectiveness of Fluoride Varnish and Fissure Sealant in Elementary School Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dariush Jafarzadeh; Ramin Rezapour; Teimour Abbasi; Jafar Sadegh Tabrizi; Maryam Zeinolabedini; Assef Khalili; Mahmood Yousefi
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Caries-Preventive Effect and Retention of Glass-Ionomer and Resin-Based Sealants: A Randomized Clinical Comparative Evaluation.

Authors:  Ilhan Uzel; Ceren Gurlek; Berna Kuter; Fahinur Ertugrul; Ece Eden
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.246

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.