Literature DB >> 16946649

In vivo evaluation of plasmid DNA encoding OP-1 protein for spine fusion.

Corinne Bright1, Ye-Soo Park, Ann N Sieber, John P Kostuik, Kam W Leong.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A posterolateral lumbar interbody arthrodesis animal model was selected to evaluate the percutaneous delivery of OP-1 plasmid DNA. OBJECTIVE.: To evaluate the feasibility of achieving ectopic bone formation using nonviral gene delivery with a minimally invasive technique, by coinjecting plasmid DNA encoding OP-1 with collagen into the paraspinal muscle. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Osteoinductive proteins show great promise for achieving spine fusion but suffer from poor bioavailability. Viral gene transfer can produce therapeutic and sustained levels of osteoinductive proteins to achieve osteogenesis in a variety of animal models. Toxicity and immunogenicity concerns, however, limit the appeal of viral gene therapy for spine fusion.
METHODS: Single-level posterior lumbar arthrodesis was attempted at L5-L6 in 64 adult Sprague-Dawley rats bilaterally. OP-1 plasmid DNA was injected with and without collagen carrier above the L5 transverse process either percutaneously or after open surgery. Bone formation was evaluated at 2 and 4 weeks by manual palpation, posterolateral radiographs, and nondecalcified histology. Control animals received the rhOP-1 protein.
RESULTS: Bone formation was detected histologically after the percutaneous and open surgical delivery of 25 microg or 500 microg, respectively, of OP-1 plasmid DNA (pVR1055-OP1) and collagen (bone formation = 75% and 50%), but was weaker than that observed after injection of 30 microg of rhOP-1 protein and collagen (bone formation = 100%). Single-level spine fusion was only achieved in groups receiving percutaneous OP-1 protein and collagen (30 microg protein, fusion rate = 100%) or high concentrations of OP-1 protein alone (40 microg protein, 100%), as confirmed through manual palpation, histology, and radiography. CONCLUSIONS.: These data confirm that OP-1 plasmid DNA can successfully generate bone formation in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16946649     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000232721.59901.45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

Review 1.  Cell-free and cell-based approaches for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Ericka M Bueno; Julie Glowacki
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 20.543

2.  3D-Printed Ceramic-Demineralized Bone Matrix Hyperelastic Bone Composite Scaffolds for Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  J Adam Driscoll; Ryan Lubbe; Adam E Jakus; Kevin Chang; Meraaj Haleem; Chawon Yun; Gurmit Singh; Andrew D Schneider; Karina M Katchko; Carmen Soriano; Michael Newton; Tristan Maerz; Xin Li; Kevin Baker; Wellington K Hsu; Ramille N Shah; Stuart R Stock; Erin L Hsu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Cell response to collagen-calcium phosphate cement scaffolds investigated for nonviral gene delivery.

Authors:  R A Perez; M P Ginebra; M Spector
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  Gene delivery to bone.

Authors:  C H Evans
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 5.  Ordinary and Activated Bone Grafts: Applied Classification and the Main Features.

Authors:  R V Deev; A Y Drobyshev; I Y Bozo; A A Isaev
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-11-15       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Lumbar spine intervertebral disc gene delivery of BMPs induces anterior spine fusion in lewis rats.

Authors:  Matthew E Cunningham; Natalie H Kelly; Bernard A Rawlins; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Chisa Hidaka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Polyethylenimine600-β-cyclodextrin: a promising nanopolymer for nonviral gene delivery of primary mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Haijun Tong; Chuandong Wang; Yan Huang; Qin Shi; Julio C Fernandes; Kerong Dai; Guping Tang; Xiaoling Zhang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2013-05-24

Review 8.  Bone Regeneration Using Gene-Activated Matrices.

Authors:  Sheetal D'Mello; Keerthi Atluri; Sean M Geary; Liu Hong; Satheesh Elangovan; Aliasger K Salem
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.603

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.