Literature DB >> 16945859

Context effects of pictures and words in naming objects, reading words, and generating simple phrases.

Ardi Roelofs1.   

Abstract

In five language production experiments it was examined which aspects of words are activated in memory by context pictures and words. Context pictures yielded Stroop-like and semantic effects on response times when participants generated gender-marked noun phrases in response to written words (Experiment 1A). However, pictures yielded no such effects when participants simply read aloud the noun phrases (Experiment 2). Moreover, pictures yielded a gender congruency effect in generating gender-marked noun phrases in response to the written words (Experiments 3A and 3B). These findings suggest that context pictures activate lemmas (i.e., representations of syntactic properties), which leads to effects only when lemmas are needed to generate a response (i.e., in Experiments 1A, 3A, and 3B, but not in Experiment 2). Context words yielded Stroop-like and semantic effects in picture naming (Experiment 1B). Moreover, words yielded Stroop-like but no semantic effects in reading nouns (Experiment 4) and in generating noun phrases (Experiment 5). These findings suggest that context words activate the lemmas and forms of their names, which leads to semantic effects when lemmas are required for responding (Experiment 1B) but not when only the forms are required (Experiment 4). WEAVER++ simulations of the results are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16945859     DOI: 10.1080/17470210500416052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  13 in total

1.  Naming and categorizing objects: task differences modulate the polarity of semantic effects in the picture-word interference paradigm.

Authors:  Ansgar Hantsch; Jörg D Jescheniak; Andreas Mädebach
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

2.  The distractor picture paradox in speech production: evidence from the word translation task.

Authors:  Eduardo Navarrete; Albert Costa
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2009-05-29

3.  Strategic allocation of attention reduces temporally predictable stimulus conflict.

Authors:  L Gregory Appelbaum; Carsten N Boehler; Robert Won; Lauren Davis; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Conscious intention to speak proactively facilitates lexical access during overt object naming.

Authors:  Kristof Strijkers; Phillip J Holcomb; Albert Costa
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Riding the lexical speedway: a critical review on the time course of lexical selection in speech production.

Authors:  Kristof Strijkers; Albert Costa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-12-02

6.  Attention demands of spoken word planning: a review.

Authors:  Ardi Roelofs; Vitória Piai
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-07

7.  Resolving competition when naming an object in a multiple-object display.

Authors:  Frank Oppermann; Jörg D Jescheniak; Frauke Görges
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-02

8.  Is naming faces different from naming objects? Semantic interference in a face- and object-naming task.

Authors:  Alejandra Marful; Daniela Paolieri; M Teresa Bajo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-04

9.  What can Written-Words Tell us About Lexical Retrieval in Speech Production?

Authors:  Eduardo Navarrete; Bradford Z Mahon; Anna Lorenzoni; Francesca Peressotti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-06

10.  It Is Not Necessary to Retrieve the Phonological Nodes of Context Objects for Chinese Speakers.

Authors:  Qingfang Zhang; Xuebing Zhu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.