Literature DB >> 16945615

Prospective comparison of patient experience with colon imaging tests.

Hayden B Bosworth1, Don C Rockey, Erik K Paulson, Donna Niedzwiecki, Wendy Davis, Linda L Sanders, Judy Yee, Jim Henderson, Paul Hatten, Steve Burdick, Arun Sanyal, David T Rubin, Mark Sterling, Geetanjali Akerkar, Manoop S Bhutani, Kenneth Binmoeller, John Garvie, Edmund J Bini, Kenneth McQuaid, William L Foster, William M Thompson, Abe Dachman, Robert Halvorsen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patient experience varies with the currently available colon imaging tests, including air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy. We examined differences in patient experience with colon imaging tests and whether they varied with gender, age, and race. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients with fecal occult blood, hematochezia, iron-deficiency anemia, or a family history of colon cancer underwent air contrast barium enema followed 7 to 14 days later by computed tomographic colonography and colonoscopy. Validated patient experience questionnaires that measured the experience for each test and a separate questionnaire that obtained an overall summary measure were administered after testing. Eleven patient experiences including pain, embarrassment, difficulty with bowel preparation, and satisfaction with tests were examined.
RESULTS: A total of 614 subjects completed all 3 imaging tests. The test most patients were willing to repeat was colonoscopy; it also was reported to be the least painful procedure. Patients were least satisfied with air contrast barium enema, and fewer would undergo air contrast barium enema compared with computed tomographic colonography or colonoscopy. There were limited racial and gender differences in perceptions of the tests. Younger adults perceived air contrast barium enema to be more painful than older adults.
CONCLUSION: Taking into account a wide variety of patient experience measures, patients preferred colonoscopy to air contrast barium enema and computed tomographic colonography. This finding has important implications for physicians considering different colon imaging tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16945615     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  17 in total

1.  Automated image-based colon cleansing for laxative-free CT colonography computer-aided polyp detection.

Authors:  Marius George Linguraru; Neil Panjwani; Joel G Fletcher; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Anne B Ballinger; Clive Anggiansah
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-10-06

3.  The elephant in the room: bowel preparation for CT colonography.

Authors:  Ronald Summers
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 4.  CT colonography: what the gastroenterologist needs to know.

Authors:  Peter N Wylie; David Burling
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02-16

Review 5.  Preference for colonoscopy versus computerized tomographic colonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Otto S Lin; Richard A Kozarek; Michael Gluck; Geoffrey C Jiranek; Johannes Koch; Kris V Kowdley; Shayan Irani; Matthew Nguyen; Jason A Dominitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Patient acceptability of CT colonography compared with double contrast barium enema: results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial of symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Christian von Wagner; Samuel Smith; Steve Halligan; Alex Ghanouni; Emily Power; Richard J Lilford; Dion Morton; Edward Dadswell; Wendy Atkin; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Preferences for CT colonography and colonoscopy as diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Kirsten Howard; Glenn Salkeld; Michael Pignone; Peter Hewett; Peter Cheung; Julie Olsen; Wayne Clapton; Ian C Roberts-Thomson
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.725

8.  Acceptance of colonoscopy requires more than test tolerance.

Authors:  Amanda Condon; Lesley Graff; Lawrence Elliot; Alexandra Ilnyckyj
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.522

9.  Determinants of variations in self-reported barriers to colonoscopy among uninsured patients in a primary care setting.

Authors:  Chinedum Ojinnaka; Ann Vuong; Janet Helduser; Philip Nash; Marcia G Ory; David A McClellan; Jane N Bolin
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-04

10.  Patient satisfaction with the endoscopy experience and willingness to return in a central Canadian health region.

Authors:  Russell Loftus; Zoann Nugent; Lesley A Graff; Frederick Schumacher; Charles N Bernstein; Harminder Singh
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.522

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.