Literature DB >> 16942746

Assay for the quantification of intact/fragmented genomic DNA.

Christos D Georgiou1, Ioannis Papapostolou.   

Abstract

This study shows that the accuracy of the quantification of genomic DNA by the commonly used Hoechst- and PicoGreen-based assays is drastically affected by its degree of fragmentation. Specifically, it was shown that these assays underestimate by 70% the concentration of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) with sizes less than 23 kb. On the other hand, DNA sizes greater and less than approximately 23 kb are commonly characterized as intact and fragmented genomic DNA, respectively, by the agarose electrophoresis DNA smearing assay and are evaluated only qualitatively by this assay. The need for accurate quantification of fragmented and total genomic DNA, combined with the lack of specific, reliable, and simple quantitative methods, prompted us to develop a Hoechst/PicoGreen-based fluorescent assay that quantifies both types of DNA. This assay addresses these problems, and in its Hoechst and PicoGreen version it accurately quantifies dsDNA as being either intact (>or=23 kb) or fragmented (<23 kb) in concentrations as low as 3 ng ml-1 or 5 pg ml-1 with Hoechst or PicoGreen, respectively, as well as the individual fractions of intact/fragmented DNA existing in any proportions in a total DNA sample in concentrations as low as 10 ng ml-1 or 15 pg ml-1 with Hoechst or PicoGreen, respectively. Because the assay discriminates total genomic DNA in the two size ranges (>or=23 and <23 kb) and quantitates them, it is proposed as the quantitative replacement of the agarose gel electrophoresis genomic DNA smearing assay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16942746     DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2006.07.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Biochem        ISSN: 0003-2697            Impact factor:   3.365


  12 in total

1.  Protocol for the quantitative assessment of DNA concentration and damage (fragmentation and nicks).

Authors:  Christos D Georgiou; Ioannis Papapostolou; Konstantinos Grintzalis
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Generating Exome Enriched Sequencing Libraries from Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue DNA for Next-Generation Sequencing.

Authors:  Beth A Marosy; Brian D Craig; Kurt N Hetrick; P Dane Witmer; Hua Ling; Sean M Griffith; Benjamin Myers; Elaine A Ostrander; Janet L Stanford; Lawrence C Brody; Kimberly F Doheny
Journal:  Curr Protoc Hum Genet       Date:  2017-01-11

3.  Estimation of age-related DNA degradation from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue according to the extraction methods.

Authors:  Mototsugu Watanabe; Shinsuke Hashida; Hiromasa Yamamoto; Takehiro Matsubara; Tomoaki Ohtsuka; Ken Suzawa; Yuho Maki; Junichi Soh; Hiroaki Asano; Kazunori Tsukuda; Shinichi Toyooka; Shinichiro Miyoshi
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Limitations of methods for measuring the concentration of human genomic DNA and oligonucleotide samples.

Authors:  Hua-Jun He; Erica V Stein; Paul DeRose; Kenneth D Cole
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.993

5.  Selection of a Noninvasive Source of Human DNA Envisaging Genotyping Assays in Epidemiological Studies: Urine or Saliva?

Authors:  Sarah J D Nauwelaerts; Dirk Van Geel; Maud Delvoye; Koen De Cremer; Alfred Bernard; Nancy H C Roosens; Sigrid C J De Keersmaecker
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2020-04

6.  DNA degradation in human teeth exposed to thermal stress.

Authors:  Diego Lozano-Peral; Leticia Rubio; Ignacio Santos; María Jesús Gaitán; Enrique Viguera; Stella Martín-de-Las-Heras
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  DNA extraction from FFPE tissue samples - a comparison of three procedures.

Authors:  Agnieszka K Sarnecka; Dominika Nawrat; Monika Piwowar; Janusz Ligęza; Jakub Swadźba; Piotr Wójcik
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2019-03-26

8.  Rapid Molecular Identification of Scolytinae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).

Authors:  Jonathan Eric Albo; Jean-Philippe Marelli; Alina Sandra Puig
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Fragmentation of DNA affects the accuracy of the DNA quantitation by the commonly used methods.

Authors:  Tatiana Sedlackova; Gabriela Repiska; Peter Celec; Tomas Szemes; Gabriel Minarik
Journal:  Biol Proced Online       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.244

10.  Pitfalls of DNA Quantification Using DNA-Binding Fluorescent Dyes and Suggested Solutions.

Authors:  Yuki Nakayama; Hiromi Yamaguchi; Naoki Einaga; Mariko Esumi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.