Literature DB >> 16941301

[Limb lengthening with a fully implantable mechanical distraction intramedullary nail].

B Leidinger1, W Winkelmann, R Roedl.   

Abstract

AIM: The morbidity of fixator-assisted distraction osteogenesis should be reduced by intramedullary lengthening devices. The ISKD (intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor) is a new, fully implantable mechanical lengthening nail. In a prospective cohort trial the possibilities and limitations of the device used on femur and tibia are examined.
METHODS: 22 patients with a mean age of 25 (range: 16-46) years were treated with an ISKD for femoral (n = 16) and tibial (n = 6) lengthening. The average leg length discrepancy was 48 (range: 25-80) mm. The follow-up was 21 (range: 7-37) months. Clinical and radiological results and complications were evaluated.
RESULTS: The results of femoral and tibial applications of the ISKD are different. At the tibia, in three patients a pseudarthrosis occurred and slow callus formation was observed twice. An equinus contracture became evident in 2 patients. At the femur, in one case the lengthening was not accomplished with the device. Five patients were manipulated under anaesthesia at least once to achieve the aim of distraction. Three of these patients received retrograde implantation of the ISKD. An infection or interlocking screw failure was not observed either at the femur or the tibia.
CONCLUSION: The ISKD reduces fixator-associated problems but incorporates its own difficulties which are mainly based on the guidance of the device. Careful patient advice in monitoring the lengthening process is mandatory. At the femur 8 cm of lengthening can be achieved but the nail tends to "block". Proper reaming and osteotomy techniques are important. A lengthening of more than 1 mm/day is recommended to prevent early consolidation. At the tibia weak callus formation and soft tissue contractures occur, therefore not more than 4 cm lengthening should be planned, the distraction speed has to be reduced noticeable below 1 mm/day and the initial immobilisation should be for more than a week.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16941301     DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-942169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb        ISSN: 0044-3220


  11 in total

1.  Precision of the PRECICE internal bone lengthening nail.

Authors:  Yatin M Kirane; Austin T Fragomen; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Limb lengthening and then insertion of an intramedullary nail: a case-matched comparison.

Authors:  S Robert Rozbruch; Dawn Kleinman; Austin T Fragomen; Svetlana Ilizarov
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Insufficient bone regenerate after intramedullary femoral lengthening: risk factors and classification system.

Authors:  Mohamed Kenawey; Christian Krettek; Emmanouil Liodakis; Rupert Meller; Stefan Hankemeier
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Ilizarov hip reconstruction without external fixation: a new technique.

Authors:  A H Krieg; U Lenze; C C Hasler
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 1.548

5.  Current concepts of leg lengthening.

Authors:  Carol C Hasler; Andreas H Krieg
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 1.548

6.  Leg lengthening with a motorized nail in adolescents : an alternative to external fixators?

Authors:  Andreas H Krieg; Bernhard M Speth; Bruce K Foster
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Cosmetic bilateral leg lengthening using intramedullary nail experience of 9 cases.

Authors:  Hasan Havitcioglu; Onur Gursan; Yagmur Isin
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-01-10

Review 8.  [Research progress of intramedullary lengthening nail technology].

Authors:  Jin Zhang; Yonghong Zhang; Chaoqi Wang; Sihe Qin
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-05-15

9.  Intramedullary leg lengthening with a motorized nail.

Authors:  Andreas H Krieg; Ulrich Lenze; Bernhard M Speth; Carol C Hasler
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Adjustment of traumatic femur shortening assisted by an intramedullar skeletal kinetic distractor: a case report.

Authors:  Sascha Rausch; Kajetan Klos; Florian Gras; Marco Dutschke; Gunther O Hofmann; Thomas Mückley
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2013-08-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.