Literature DB >> 16940430

Detection of SNP epistasis effects of quantitative traits using an extended Kempthorne model.

Yongcai Mao1, Nicole R London, Li Ma, Daniel Dvorkin, Yang Da.   

Abstract

Epistasis effects (gene interactions) have been increasingly recognized as important genetic factors underlying complex traits. The existence of a large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) provides opportunities and challenges to screen DNA variations affecting complex traits using a candidate gene analysis. In this article, four types of epistasis effects of two candidate gene SNPs with Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium (HWD) and linkage disequilibrium (LD) are considered: additive x additive, additive x dominance, dominance x additive, and dominance x dominance. The Kempthorne genetic model was chosen for its appealing genetic interpretations of the epistasis effects. The method in this study consists of extension of Kempthorne's definitions of 35 individual genetic effects to allow HWD and LD, genetic contrasts of the 35 extended individual genetic effects to define the 4 epistasis effects, and a linear model method for testing epistasis effects. Formulas to predict statistical power (as a function of contrast heritability, sample size, and type I error) and sample size (as a function of contrast heritability, type I error, and type II error) for detecting each epistasis effect were derived, and the theoretical predictions agreed well with simulation studies. The accuracy in estimating each epistasis effect and rates of false positives in the absence of all or three epistasis effects were evaluated using simulations. The method for epistasis testing can be a useful tool to understand the exact mode of epistasis, to assemble genome-wide SNPs into an epistasis network, and to assemble all SNP effects affecting a phenotype using pairwise epistasis tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16940430     DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00096.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Genomics        ISSN: 1094-8341            Impact factor:   3.107


  22 in total

1.  Multiallelic models of genetic effects and variance decomposition in non-equilibrium populations.

Authors:  José M Álvarez-Castro; Rong-Cai Yang
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Efficient Algorithms for Calculating Epistatic Genomic Relationship Matrices.

Authors:  Yong Jiang; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genome-wide association analysis of total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels using the Framingham heart study data.

Authors:  Li Ma; Jing Yang; H Birali Runesha; Toshiko Tanaka; Luigi Ferrucci; Stefania Bandinelli; Yang Da
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 2.103

4.  Epistasis between calpain 1 and its inhibitor calpastatin within breeds of cattle.

Authors:  W Barendse; B E Harrison; R J Hawken; D M Ferguson; J M Thompson; M B Thomas; R J Bunch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  A new mapping method for quantitative trait loci of silkworm.

Authors:  Hai-Ming Xu; Chang-Shuai Wei; Yun-Ting Tang; Zhi-Hong Zhu; Yang-Fu Sima; Xiang-Yang Lou
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 2.797

6.  A genome-wide SNP scan reveals novel loci for egg production and quality traits in white leghorn and brown-egg dwarf layers.

Authors:  Wenbo Liu; Dongfeng Li; Jianfeng Liu; Sirui Chen; Lujiang Qu; Jiangxia Zheng; Guiyun Xu; Ning Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Genome-wide association study identified a narrow chromosome 1 region associated with chicken growth traits.

Authors:  Liang Xie; Chenglong Luo; Chengguang Zhang; Rong Zhang; Jun Tang; Qinghua Nie; Li Ma; Xiaoxiang Hu; Ning Li; Yang Da; Xiquan Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Contribution of genetic effects to genetic variance components with epistasis and linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Zhao-Bang Zeng
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 2.797

9.  Effect of sample stratification on dairy GWAS results.

Authors:  Li Ma; George R Wiggans; Shengwen Wang; Tad S Sonstegard; Jing Yang; Brian A Crooker; John B Cole; Curtis P Van Tassell; Thomas J Lawlor; Yang Da
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Genetic parameters and genome-wide association study of hyperpigmentation of the visceral peritoneum in chickens.

Authors:  Chenglong Luo; Hao Qu; Jie Wang; Yan Wang; Jie Ma; Chunyu Li; Chunfen Yang; Xiaoxiang Hu; Ning Li; Dingming Shu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.