Literature DB >> 16939480

Stroke volume variation does not predict fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation.

A Perner1, T Faber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stroke volume variation (SVV)--as measured by the pulse contour cardiac output (PiCCO) system--predicts the cardiac output response to a fluid challenge in patients on controlled ventilation. Whether this applies to patients on pressure support ventilation is unknown.
METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with septic shock were included. All were on pressure support ventilation, monitored using the PiCCO system and receiving 500 ml of colloid on clinical indications. Arterial pulse contour SVV and the transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac index were measured before and after fluid challenge.
RESULTS: Forty-seven per cent of the patients were defined as fluid responders by an observed increase of > 10% in the cardiac index after fluid. Prior to fluid challenge, the cardiac index was lower in responders compared with non-responders (mean +/- SD, 3.0 +/- 0.6 vs. 4.0 +/- 1.2 l/min/m2, P < 0.01). In contrast, pre-infusion values of SVV were similar between subsequent responders and non-responders (13 +/- 5 vs. 16 +/- 6%, P =0.26). The mean areas under the ROC curves were 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.94) and 0.52 (0.30-0.73) for pre-fluid cardiac index and SVV, respectively, indicating a predictive power of only the cardiac index.
CONCLUSIONS: SVV did not predict the response in cardiac output to fluid challenge in patients with septic shock on pressure support ventilation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16939480     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01120.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  24 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies.

Authors:  Fabio Cavallaro; Claudio Sandroni; Cristina Marano; Giuseppe La Torre; Alice Mannocci; Chiara De Waure; Giuseppe Bello; Riccardo Maviglia; Massimo Antonelli
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Assessing dynamic fluid-responsiveness using transthoracic echocardiography in intensive care.

Authors:  N Desai; D Garry
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2018-03-30

Review 3.  [Comments on the updated German S3 guidelines on intravascular volume therapy in adults].

Authors:  Emmanuel Schneck; Michael Sander; Bernd Saugel; Daniel A Reuter; Marit Habicher
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Baolong Lu; Xiaoyan Sheng; Ni Jin
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 5.  Fluid challenge in critically ill patients receiving haemodynamic monitoring: a systematic review and comparison of two decades.

Authors:  Antonio Messina; Lorenzo Calabrò; Luca Pugliese; Aulona Lulja; Alexandra Sopuch; Daniela Rosalba; Emanuela Morenghi; Glenn Hernandez; Xavier Monnet; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 19.334

6.  Echocardiographic prediction of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneously breathing activity.

Authors:  Bouchra Lamia; Ana Ochagavia; Xavier Monnet; Denis Chemla; Christian Richard; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Pulse pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with spontaneous breathing activity: a pragmatic observational study.

Authors:  P Grassi; L Lo Nigro; K Battaglia; M Barone; F Testa; G Berlot
Journal:  HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth       Date:  2013

8.  Appreciating the strengths and weaknesses of transthoracic echocardiography in hemodynamic assessments.

Authors:  Stephen J Huang; Anthony S McLean
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 1.866

Review 9.  Hepatorenal syndrome: the 8th International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group.

Authors:  Mitra K Nadim; John A Kellum; Andrew Davenport; Florence Wong; Connie Davis; Neesh Pannu; Ashita Tolwani; Rinaldo Bellomo; Yuri S Genyk
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Physiological changes after fluid bolus therapy in sepsis: a systematic review of contemporary data.

Authors:  Neil J Glassford; Glenn M Eastwood; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-12-27       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.