Literature DB >> 16939408

Association between bone mass and fractures in children: a prospective cohort study.

Emma M Clark1, Andy R Ness, Nicholas J Bishop, Jon H Tobias.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: This is the first prospective cohort study of the association between bone mass and fracture risk in childhood. A total of 6213 children 9.9 years of age were followed for 24 months. Results showed an 89% increased risk of fracture per SD decrease in size-adjusted BMC.
INTRODUCTION: Although previous case-control studies have reported that fracture risk in childhood is inversely related to bone mass, this has not been confirmed in prospective studies. Additionally, it remains unclear which constituent(s) of bone mass underlie this association. We carried out a prospective cohort study to examine the relationship between DXA measures in children 9.9 years of age and risk of fracture over the following 2 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total body DXA scan results obtained at 9.9 years of age were linked to reported fractures over the following 2 years in children from a large birth cohort in southwest England. DXA measures consisted of total body less head (TBLH) BMD, bone area, and BMC, and results of subregional analysis of the humerus. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, and social position.
RESULTS: Complete data were available on 6213 children. There was a weak inverse relationship between BMD at 9.9 years and subsequent fracture risk (OR per SD decrease = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02-1.25). In analyses examining the relationship between fracture risk and volumetric BMD, fracture risk was inversely related to BMC adjusted for bone area, height, and weight (OR = 1.89; 95% CI, 1.18-3.04) and to estimated volumetric BMD of the humerus (OR = 1.29; 95% CI, 1.14-1.45). Fracture risk was unrelated to both TBLH and humeral bone area. However, in analyses of the relationship between fracture risk and bone size relative to body size, an inverse association was observed between fracture risk and TBLH area adjusted for height and weight (OR = 1.51; 95% CI, 1.17-1.95).
CONCLUSIONS: Fracture risk in childhood is related to volumetric BMD, reflecting an influence of determinants of volumetric BMD such as cortical thickness on skeletal fragility. Although bone size per se was not related to fracture risk, we found that children who fracture tend to have a smaller skeleton relative to their overall body size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16939408      PMCID: PMC2742714          DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.060601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  31 in total

1.  Incidence of childhood fractures in affluent and deprived areas: population based study.

Authors:  R A Lyons; A M Delahunty; M Heaven; M McCabe; H Allen; P Nash
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-15

2.  The state of pediatric bone: summary of the ASBMR pediatric bone initiative.

Authors:  Gordon L Klein; Lorraine A Fitzpatrick; Craig B Langman; Thomas J Beck; Thomas O Carpenter; Vicente Gilsanz; Ingrid A Holm; Mary B Leonard; Bonny L Specker
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  A retrospective study of the demographics of sport and exercise injuries in 1143 children presenting to an Irish emergency department over a 6-month period.

Authors:  Killian Patrick O'Rourke; Sean Mun; Mary Browne; John Sheehan; Steven Cusack; Michael Molloy
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Bone and body composition of children and adolescents with repeated forearm fractures.

Authors:  Ailsa Goulding; Andrea M Grant; Sheila M Williams
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 5.  Examining the developing bone: What do we measure and how do we do it?

Authors:  M A Petit; T J Beck; S A Kontulainen
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.041

6.  Fractures and recurrent fractures in children; varying effects of environmental factors as well as bone size and mass.

Authors:  Karen Manias; Debbie McCabe; Nick Bishop
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Bone mineral density in girls with forearm fractures.

Authors:  A Goulding; R Cannan; S M Williams; E J Gold; R W Taylor; N J Lewis-Barned
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Epidemiology of childhood fractures in Britain: a study using the general practice research database.

Authors:  Cyrus Cooper; Elaine M Dennison; Herbert G M Leufkens; Nicholas Bishop; Tjeerd P van Staa
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-09-20       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Fractures among children: incidence and impact on daily activities.

Authors:  B Kopjar; T M Wickizer
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 10.  Association between bone density and fractures in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  E M Clark; J H Tobias; A R Ness
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  111 in total

Review 1.  Analyses of muscular mass and function: the impact on bone mineral density and peak muscle mass.

Authors:  Oliver Fricke; Ralf Beccard; Oliver Semler; Eckhard Schoenau
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  Influence of age and morphological characteristics on whole body, lumbar spine, femoral neck and 1/3 radius bone mineral apparent density in a group of Lebanese adolescent boys.

Authors:  Rawad El Hage; Elie Moussa; Zaher El Hage; Denis Theunynck; Christophe Jacob
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Achieving the protection of high peak bone mass.

Authors:  R P Heaney
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Reference values for bone mineral density according to age with body size adjustment in Korean children and adolescents.

Authors:  Kyung Hee Yi; Jin Soon Hwang; Eun Young Kim; Jun Ah Lee; Dong Ho Kim; Jung Sub Lim
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 5.  Influence of body weight on bone mass, architecture and turnover.

Authors:  Urszula T Iwaniec; Russell T Turner
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 4.286

6.  Which bone mass measures discriminate adolescents who have fractured from those who have not?

Authors:  G Jones; P Boon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Genetics of pediatric bone strength.

Authors:  Jonathan A Mitchell; Diana L Cousminer; Babette S Zemel; Struan F A Grant; Alessandra Chesi
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-07-20

8.  Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) on DXA evaluation in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Bianchi; Sanford Baim; Nick J Bishop; Catherine M Gordon; Didier B Hans; Craig B Langman; Mary B Leonard; Heidi J Kalkwarf
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.714

9.  Changes in biomarkers of bone resorption over the first six months after pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  L E Polgreen; K Rudser; M Deyo; A Smith; K S Baker; A Petryk
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2012-08-20

10.  Validity of parental recall of children's fracture: implications for investigation of childhood osteoporosis.

Authors:  R J Moon; A Lim; M Farmer; A Segaran; N M P Clarke; N C Harvey; C Cooper; J H Davies
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.