Literature DB >> 16938432

The misbehavior of value and the discipline of the will.

Peter Dayan1, Yael Niv, Ben Seymour, Nathaniel D Daw.   

Abstract

Most reinforcement learning models of animal conditioning operate under the convenient, though fictive, assumption that Pavlovian conditioning concerns prediction learning whereas instrumental conditioning concerns action learning. However, it is only through Pavlovian responses that Pavlovian prediction learning is evident, and these responses can act against the instrumental interests of the subjects. This can be seen in both experimental and natural circumstances. In this paper we study the consequences of importing this competition into a reinforcement learning context, and demonstrate the resulting effects in an omission schedule and a maze navigation task. The misbehavior created by Pavlovian values can be quite debilitating; we discuss how it may be disciplined.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16938432     DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Netw        ISSN: 0893-6080


  117 in total

Review 1.  From reinforcement learning models to psychiatric and neurological disorders.

Authors:  Tiago V Maia; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Supplementary eye field encodes option and action value for saccades with variable reward.

Authors:  Na-Young So; Veit Stuphorn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Opponency revisited: competition and cooperation between dopamine and serotonin.

Authors:  Y-Lan Boureau; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 4.  Ventral striatum: a critical look at models of learning and evaluation.

Authors:  Matthijs A A van der Meer; A David Redish
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Decision makers calibrate behavioral persistence on the basis of time-interval experience.

Authors:  Joseph T McGuire; Joseph W Kable
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-04-23

Review 6.  A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making.

Authors:  Antonio Rangel; Colin Camerer; P Read Montague
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Optimal indolence: a normative microscopic approach to work and leisure.

Authors:  Ritwik K Niyogi; Yannick-Andre Breton; Rebecca B Solomon; Kent Conover; Peter Shizgal; Peter Dayan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Dopamine and the cognitive downside of a promised bonus.

Authors:  Esther Aarts; Deanna L Wallace; Linh C Dang; William J Jagust; Roshan Cools; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-02-13

Review 9.  What the orbitofrontal cortex does not do.

Authors:  Thomas A Stalnaker; Nisha K Cooch; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Dopaminergic prediction errors persevere in the nucleus accumbens core during negative reinforcement.

Authors:  Nick G Hollon; Marta E Soden; Matthew J Wanat
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.