Literature DB >> 16937280

Limiting vein puncture to three needle passes in subclavian vein catheterization by the infraclavicular approach.

Hiromitsu Takeyama1, Masaaki Taniguchi, Hirozumi Sawai, Hitoshi Funahashi, Yoshimi Akamo, Sadao Suzuki, Tadao Manabe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: With central venous catheterization, each additional vein puncture raises the risk of complications. We assessed the rate of failure and complications using a limiting rule whereby the number of needle passes for subclavian vein catheterization was restricted to three.
METHODS: A prospective clinical trial was conducted between September 2001 and December 2003 in a university hospital surgical department. Two hundred and thirty-two adult patients were enrolled to undergo subclavian vein catheterization under non-emergency conditions. The patients were subjected to right subclavian vein catheterization by the infraclavicular approach. Vein puncture failure was defined as such if venipuncture was not accomplished after three attempts. Any arterial puncture was judged to be a failure immediately.
RESULTS: Vein puncture failure occurred in nine patients (3.9%), and included two arterial punctures (0.9%). No other complications, such as pneumothorax, hemothorax, plexus lesion, mediastinal hematoma or bleeding, or air embolism, were observed. In multivariate analyses, a close to average body mass index (weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters, odds ratio 0.74; 95% confidence interval 0.56-0.97; P = 0.028) was associated with a low risk of failure.
CONCLUSION: Limiting the number of needle passes to three may therefore prevent mechanical complications. A low body mass index was predictive of vein puncture failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16937280     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-006-3259-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  10 in total

Review 1.  Complications of central venous catheters: internal jugular versus subclavian access--a systematic review.

Authors:  Sibylle Ruesch; Bernhard Walder; Martin R Tramèr
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 2.  Preventing complications of central venous catheterization.

Authors:  David C McGee; Michael K Gould
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Malposition of central venous catheters outside the central circulation.

Authors:  D R Gentili; D Onofrey; G V Gabrielson; E Benjamin; T J Iberti
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Anesth       Date:  1989-12

4.  Azygos arch cannulation by central venous catheters: radiographic detection of malposition and subsequent complications.

Authors:  A A Bankier; R Mallek; M N Wiesmayr; D Fleischmann; A Kranz; M Kontrus; S Knapp; F W Winkelbauer
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Effect of patient position upon success in placing central venous catheters.

Authors:  R Boyd; A Saxe; E Phillips
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Complications and failures of subclavian-vein catheterization.

Authors:  P F Mansfield; D C Hohn; B D Fornage; M A Gregurich; D M Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-12-29       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  J Merrer; B De Jonghe; F Golliot; J Y Lefrant; B Raffy; E Barre; J P Rigaud; D Casciani; B Misset; C Bosquet; H Outin; C Brun-Buisson; G Nitenberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-08-08       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Authors:  Naomi P O'Grady; Mary Alexander; E Patchen Dellinger; Julie L Gerberding; Stephen O Heard; Dennis G Maki; Henry Masur; Rita D McCormick; Leonard A Mermel; Michele L Pearson; Issam I Raad; Adrienne Randolph; Robert A Weinstein
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2002-08-09

9.  Superior vena cava thrombosis related to catheter malposition in cancer chemotherapy given through implanted ports.

Authors:  V Puel; M Caudry; P Le Métayer; J C Baste; D Midy; C Marsault; H Demeaux; J P Maire
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Evaluation of formulas for optimal positioning of central venous catheters.

Authors:  C A Czepizak; J M O'Callaghan; B Venus
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 9.410

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  Intermittent forearm cyanosis.

Authors:  Roger W Simon; Beatrice R Amann-Vesti
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  [Catheterization of the subclavian vein and the risk of pneumothorax : Mechanical ventilation increases the risk of pneumothorax during infraclavicular landmark-guided subclavian vein puncture: a prospective randomized study].

Authors:  T Palmaers; P Frank; H Eismann; L Sieg; A Leffler; H Schmitt; A Scholler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Impact of ultrasonography on central venous catheter insertion in intensive care.

Authors:  Gopal B Palepu; Juneja Deven; M Subrahmanyam; S Mohan
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep

4.  Evaluation of ultrasound for central venous access in ICU by an in experienced trainee.

Authors:  Neeta Bose; Hasmukh Patel; Hemlata Kamat
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-01

5.  Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement in the emergency department: experience in a hospital in Bogotá, Colombia.

Authors:  German Devia Jaramillo; Jenny Torres Castillo; Freddy Lozano; Angélica Ramírez
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2018-05-24

6.  Risk factors for failure of subclavian vein catheterization: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Ren-Xiong Chen; Hong-Zhi Wang; Yong Yang; Xiao-Jie Chen
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-03-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.