Literature DB >> 16936307

Psychosocial aspects of surrogate motherhood.

Olga B A van den Akker1.   

Abstract

This review addresses the psychosocial research carried out on surrogacy triads (surrogate mothers, commissioning mothers and offspring) and shows that research has focused on a number of specific issues: attachment and disclosure to surrogate offspring; experiences, characteristics and motivations of surrogate mothers; and changes in profiles of the commissioning/intended mothers. Virtually all studies have used highly selected samples making generalizations difficult. There have been a notable lack of theory, no interventions and only a handful of longitudinal studies or studies comparing different populations. Few studies have specifically questioned the meaning of and need for a family or the influence and impact that professionals, treatment availability and financial factors have on the choices made for surrogate and intended mothers. Societal attitudes have changed somewhat; however, according to public opinion, women giving up babies still fall outside the acceptable remit. Surrogate and intended mothers appear to reconcile their unusual choice through a process of cognitive restructuring, and the success or failure of this cognitive appraisal affects people's willingness to be open and honest about their choices. Normal population surveys, on the contrary, are less accepting of third party reproduction; they have no personal need to reconsider and hence maintain their original normative cognitively consonant state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16936307     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dml039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  10 in total

1.  The body, emotions and intentions: challenges of preconception arrangements for health care providers.

Authors:  Juliet Guichon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Rethinking "Commercial" Surrogacy in Australia.

Authors:  Jenni Millbank
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  The harm argument against surrogacy revisited: two versions not to forget.

Authors:  Marcus Agnafors
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2014-08

Review 4.  Infertile Women's Opinion Concerning Gestational Surrogacy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sanaz Musavi; Hossein Mashhadi Abdolahi; Morteza Ghojazadeh; Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi; Zeinab Nikniaz; Leila Nikniaz
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.429

5.  Emotional experiences in surrogate mothers: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Hoda Ahmari Tehran; Shohreh Tashi; Nahid Mehran; Narges Eskandari; Tahmineh Dadkhah Tehrani
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2014-07

6.  The psychological well-being and prenatal bonding of gestational surrogates.

Authors:  N Lamba; V Jadva; K Kadam; S Golombok
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Mothers for Others: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Gestational Surrogates' Child Relinquishment Experiences.

Authors:  Austin P Ferolino; Mia Angelica D Camposo; Karla Christianne L Estaño; Jessa Marie R Tacbobo
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2020-01-15

8.  Building Irish families through surrogacy: medical and judicial issues for the advanced reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Eric Scott Sills; Clifford M Healy
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 3.223

9.  Nine centuries waiting: The experiences of Iranians surrogacy commissioning mothers.

Authors:  Mitra Zandi; Zohreh Vanaki; Marziyeh Shiva; Eesa Mohammadi
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2014-05

10.  A mental health program for infertile couples undergoing oocyte donation: protocol for a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Shohre Ghelich-Khani; Ashraf Kazemi; Malek Fereidooni-Moghadam; Mousa Alavi
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.223

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.