Literature DB >> 16933758

Different cognitive processes in two image-scanning paradigms.

Grégoire Borst1, Stephen M Kosslyn, Michel Denis.   

Abstract

Mental image scanning is generally assumed to be a single process that allows people to shift attention across visualized objects. However, this implicit assumption is open to question. We report a set of three experiments based on the tasks originally designed by Kosslyn, Ball, and Reiser (1978) and Finke and Pinker (1982). Participants scanned the identical images of an array of dots in the two tasks. Nevertheless, the participants required more time to shift their focus over the imaged stimulus in the Kosslyn et al. (1978) paradigm. Moreover, correlational analyses revealed no consistent relationship between the slopes of the increases in scanning times with increasing distances in the two paradigms. We conclude that in the Kosslyn et al. (1978) paradigm, the participants draw primarily on transformational processes to scan, whereas in the Finke and Pinker (1982) paradigm, they draw primarily on attentional processes. Both processes, transforming the image and shifting an attention window, produce linear increases in time with increases in distance, but for different reasons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16933758     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  20 in total

1.  Mental imagery: against the nihilistic hypothesis.

Authors:  Stephen M. Kosslyn; Giorgio Ganis; William L. Thompson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Structural properties of visual images constructed from poorly or well-structured verbal descriptions.

Authors:  M Denis; M Cocude
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-09

3.  Age differences in imagery abilities.

Authors:  S M Kosslyn; J A Margolis; A M Barrett; E J Goldknopf; P F Daly
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1990-08

4.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of component processes in human working memory.

Authors:  A Gevins; B Cutillo
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-09

5.  Directional scanning of remembered visual patterns.

Authors:  R A Finke; S Pinker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Imagery paradigms: how vulnerable are they to experimenters' expectations?

Authors:  M J Intons-Peterson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Confirmed reservations: mental travel.

Authors:  D B Mitchell; C L Richman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Mental imagery and the third dimension.

Authors:  S Pinker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1980-09

9.  Visual images preserve metric spatial information: evidence from studies of image scanning.

Authors:  S M Kosslyn; T M Ball; B J Reiser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06
View more
  5 in total

1.  Structural properties of spatial representations in blind people: Scanning images constructed from haptic exploration or from locomotion in a 3-D audio virtual environment.

Authors:  Amandine Afonso; Alan Blum; Brian F G Katz; Philippe Tarroux; Grégoire Borst; Michel Denis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

2.  Visual mental imagery and visual perception: structural equivalence revealed by scanning processes.

Authors:  Gregoire Borst; Stephen M Kosslyn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-06

3.  Attention mechanisms underlying dual-color digital visual search based on Schulte grid: An event-related potential study.

Authors:  Aiqiang Lu; Dongmei Wang; Shengxi He; Qiuyi Zhongcheng; Wei Zhang; Zezhi Li
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 2.708

4.  Differences between Spatial and Visual Mental Representations.

Authors:  Jan Frederik Sima; Holger Schultheis; Thomas Barkowsky
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-08

5.  Iterative fragmentation of cognitive maps in a visual imagery task.

Authors:  Maryam Fourtassi; Abderrazak Hajjioui; Christian Urquizar; Yves Rossetti; Gilles Rode; Laure Pisella
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.