Literature DB >> 16931953

Nucleolar grade but not Fuhrman grade is applicable to papillary renal cell carcinoma.

Dianne Sika-Paotonu1, Peter B Bethwaite, Margaret R E McCredie, T William Jordan, Brett Delahunt.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken to determine the validity of Fuhrman grading in a series of papillary renal cell carcinomas (PRCCs), to examine the interrelationship and prognostic significance of the individual components of the grading system, and further to determine whether any observed predictive value was independent of other prognostic indicators. Ninety cases of PRCC were studied. Fifty-nine tumors were of type 1 and 31 were of type 2. There were 33 TNM stage 1, 26 stage 2, 18 stage 3, and 12 stage 4 tumors, whereas division of cases according to pT category showed 14 pT1a, 20 pT1b, 25 pT2, 15 pT3a, 4 pT3b, and 11 pT4 tumors. Ten tumors were grade 1, 58 grade 2, and 22 grade 3 when predominant Fuhrman grade was assigned, whereas grading according to the high-power field containing the highest grade (focal grade) showed 40 grade 2, 49 grade 3, and 1 grade 4 tumors. Measurements of nuclear size (area, major axis, perimeter) and shape (shape factor, compactness) were undertaken using image analysis. Nuclear area ranged from 27.63 to 116.39 microM, major axis length 6.70 to 14.06 microM, and nuclear perimeter 20.05 to 41.77 microM. Shape factor ranged from 0.805 to 0.878 and compactness from 14.33 to 15.66. Predominant nucleolar grade using the criteria of the Fuhrman classification was nucleolar grade 1 for 13 tumors, nucleolar grade 2 for 56 tumors, and nucleolar grade 3 for 21 tumors. Focal nucleolar grade based on the high-power field showing the greatest degree of nuclear pleomorphism, was grade 2 for 38 tumors and grade 3 for 52 tumors. pT category, TNM stage, focal Fuhrman grade, and PRCC type were significantly associated with survival. Of the various measures of the components of the Fuhrman classification, only focal nucleolar grade was associated with survival, on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, focal nucleolar grade and tumor diameter were independently associated with survival, whereas TNM stage retained significance independent of other parameters. It is concluded that assessment of nucleolar prominence rather than Fuhrman grade is applicable for stratification of tumors within TNM stage or pT category for PRCC and that this should be based upon the high-power field showing the greatest degree of nuclear pleomorphism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16931953     DOI: 10.1097/01.pas.0000209833.69972.2b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  21 in total

1.  [Vancouver classification of renal tumors: Recommendations of the 2012 consensus conference of the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)].

Authors:  G Kristiansen; B Delahunt; J R Srigley; C Lüders; J-M Lunkenheimer; H Gevensleben; T Thiesler; R Montironi; L Egevad
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  [The WHO/ISUP grading system for renal carcinoma].

Authors:  H Moch
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Answer to comment on manuscript "Prognostic significance of Fuhrman grade and age for cancer-specific and overall survival in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma: results of an international multi-institutional study on 2189 patients".

Authors:  H Borgmann; M Musquera; M May; S D Brookman-May
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  MiT family translocation renal cell carcinomas: A 15th anniversary update.

Authors:  Jatin S Gandhi; Faizan Malik; Mahul B Amin; Pedram Argani; Armita Bahrami
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  CT texture analysis in the differentiation of major renal cell carcinoma subtypes and correlation with Fuhrman grade.

Authors:  Yu Deng; Erik Soule; Aster Samuel; Sakhi Shah; Enming Cui; Michael Asare-Sawiri; Chandru Sundaram; Chandana Lall; Kumaresan Sandrasegaran
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Fuhrman grading is inappropriate for papillary renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Brett Delahunt; Lars Egevad; John R Srigley; Hemamali Samaratunga
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Prognostic implications of the magnetic resonance imaging appearance in papillary renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Aarti Sekhar; Elizabeth M Genega; Jonathan Melamed; James S Babb; Amish D Patel; Andy Lo; Robert M Najarian; Muneeb Ahmed; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  BMI-1 expression is inversely correlated with the grading of renal clear cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Nicolas Kozakowski; Afschin Soleiman; Johannes Pammer
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 3.201

9.  Multiphasic contrast-enhanced MRI: single-slice versus volumetric quantification of tumor enhancement for the assessment of renal clear-cell carcinoma fuhrman grade.

Authors:  Hebert Alberto Vargas; Holly G Delaney; Eithne M Delappe; Ya Wang; Junting Zheng; Chaya S Moskowitz; Yongqiang Tan; Binsheng Zhao; Lawrence H Schwartz; Hedvig Hricak; Paul Russo; Oguz Akin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 10.  The changing face of renal cell carcinoma pathology.

Authors:  Hakan Aydin; Ming Zhou
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.