Literature DB >> 16929034

McMaster PLUS: a cluster randomized clinical trial of an intervention to accelerate clinical use of evidence-based information from digital libraries.

R Brian Haynes1, Jennifer Holland, Chris Cotoi, R James McKinlay, Nancy L Wilczynski, Leslie A Walters, Dawn Jedras, Rick Parrish, K Ann McKibbon, Amit Garg, Stephen D Walter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physicians have difficulty keeping up with new evidence from medical research.
METHODS: We developed the McMaster Premium LiteratUre Service (PLUS), an internet-based addition to an existing digital library, which delivered quality- and relevance-rated medical literature to physicians, matched to their clinical disciplines. We evaluated PLUS in a cluster-randomized trial of 203 participating physicians in Northern Ontario, comparing a Full-Serve version (that included alerts to new articles and a cumulative database of alerts) with a Self-Serve version (that included a passive guide to evidence-based literature). Utilization of the service was the primary trial end-point.
RESULTS: Mean logins to the library rose by 0.77 logins/month/user (95% CI 0.43, 1.11) in the Full-Serve group compared with the Self-Serve group. The proportion of Full-Serve participants who utilized the service during each month of the study period showed a sustained increase during the intervention period, with a relative increase of 57% (95% CI 12, 123) compared with the Self-Serve group. There were no differences in these proportions during the baseline period, and following the crossover of the Self-Serve group to Full-Serve, the Self-Serve group's usage became indistinguishable from that of the Full-Serve group (relative difference 4.4 (95% CI -23.7, 43.0). Also during the intervention and crossover periods, measures of self-reported usefulness did not show a difference between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSION: A quality- and relevance-rated online literature service increased the utilization of evidence-based information from a digital library by practicing physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16929034      PMCID: PMC1656957          DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  17 in total

1.  Variation in the use of online clinical evidence: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  A Sophie Gosling; Johanna I Westbrook; Enrico W Coiera
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  A taxonomy of generic clinical questions: classification study.

Authors:  J W Ely; J A Osheroff; P N Gorman; M H Ebell; M L Chambliss; E A Pifer; P Z Stavri
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-08-12

3.  Access to the online evidence base in general practice: a survey of the Northern and Yorkshire Region.

Authors:  Paul Wilson; Julie Glanville; Ian Watt
Journal:  Health Info Libr J       Date:  2003-09

4.  A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction.

Authors:  E M Antman; J Lau; B Kupelnick; F Mosteller; T C Chalmers
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-07-08       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Physicians' Internet information-seeking behaviors.

Authors:  Nancy L Bennett; Linda L Casebeer; Robert E Kristofco; Sheryl M Strasser
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  McMaster Premium Literature Service (PLUS): an evidence-based medicine information service delivered on the Web.

Authors:  Jennifer Holland; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

7.  What clinical information do doctors need?

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-10-26

8.  Obstacles to answering doctors' questions about patient care with evidence: qualitative study.

Authors:  John W Ely; Jerome A Osheroff; Mark H Ebell; M Lee Chambliss; Daniel C Vinson; James J Stevermer; Eric A Pifer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-23

9.  Evidence-based medicine in general practice: beliefs and barriers among Australian GPs.

Authors:  J M Young; J E Ward
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.431

10.  A qualitative study of evidence in primary care: what the practitioners are saying.

Authors:  Wayne Putnam; Peter L Twohig; Frederick I Burge; Lois A Jackson; Jafna L Cox
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  23 in total

1.  Which journals do primary care physicians and specialists access from an online service?

Authors:  K Ann McKibbon; R Brian Haynes; R James McKinlay; Cynthia Lokker
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2007-07

2.  Evidence-based Medicine Search: a customizable federated search engine.

Authors:  Paul J Bracke; David K Howse; Samuel M Keim
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2008-04

3.  Community-based knowledge transfer and exchange: helping community-based organizations link research to action.

Authors:  Michael G Wilson; John N Lavis; Robb Travers; Sean B Rourke
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Impact of research-based synopses delivered as daily e-mail: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Roland M Grad; Pierre Pluye; Jay Mercer; Bernard Marlow; Marie-Eve Beauchamp; Michael Shulha; Janique Johnson-Lafleur; Sharon Wood-Dauphinee
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  Electronic retrieval of health information by healthcare providers to improve practice and patient care.

Authors:  Jessie L McGowan; Roland Grad; Pierre Pluye; Karin Hannes; Katherine Deane; Michel Labrecque; Vivian Welch; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

6.  Randomized Controlled Trial of RSS Reader Use and Resident Familiarity With Primary Literature.

Authors:  Brian P Jenssen; Bimal R Desai; James M Callahan
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-06

Review 7.  Interventions for promoting information and communication technologies adoption in healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Gagnon; France Légaré; Michel Labrecque; Pierre Frémont; Pierre Pluye; Johanne Gagnon; Josip Car; Claudia Pagliari; Marie Desmartis; Lucile Turcot; Karine Gravel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-01-21

8.  A structured classification of the types of pain research studies accessed by different health professionals involved in pain management.

Authors:  Vanitha Arumugam; Joy C MacDermid; Ruby Grewal; Zakir Uddin
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2019-07-09

9.  Effects of an evidence service on community-based AIDS service organizations' use of research evidence: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael G Wilson; John N Lavis; Jeremy M Grimshaw; R Brian Haynes; Tsegaye Bekele; Sean B Rourke
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  "Push" versus "Pull" for mobilizing pain evidence into practice across different health professions: a protocol for a randomized trial.

Authors:  Joy C MacDermid; Mary Law; Norman Buckley; Robert Brian Haynes
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.