Literature DB >> 16928799

Rapid and long-lasting plasticity of input-output mapping.

Kenji Yamamoto1, Donna S Hoffman, Peter L Strick.   

Abstract

Skilled use of tools requires us to learn an "input-output map" for the device, i.e., how our movements relate to the actions of the device. We used the paradigm of visuo-motor rotation to examine two questions about the plasticity of input-output maps: 1) does extensive practice on one mapping make it difficult to modify and/or to form a new input-output map and 2) once a map has been modified or a new map has been formed, does this map survive a gap in performance? Humans and monkeys made wrist movements to control the position of a cursor on a computer monitor. Humans practiced the task for approximately 1.5 h; monkeys practiced for 3-9 yr. After this practice, we gradually altered the direction of cursor movement relative to wrist movement while subjects moved either to a single target or to four targets. Subjects were unaware of the change in cursor-movement relationship. Despite their prior practice on the task, the humans and the monkeys quickly adjusted their motor output to compensate for the visuo-motor rotation. Monkeys retained the modified input-output map during a 2-wk gap in motor performance. Humans retained the altered map during a gap of >1 yr. Our results show that sensorimotor performance remains flexible despite considerable practice on a specific task, and even relatively short-term exposure to a new input-output mapping leads to a long-lasting change in motor performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16928799     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00209.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  16 in total

1.  The curvature and variability of wrist and arm movements.

Authors:  Steven K Charles; Neville Hogan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Neural substrates of visuomotor learning based on improved feedback control and prediction.

Authors:  Scott T Grafton; Paul Schmitt; John Van Horn; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Explaining savings for visuomotor adaptation: linear time-invariant state-space models are not sufficient.

Authors:  Eric Zarahn; Gregory D Weston; Johnny Liang; Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Retention of proprioceptive recalibration following visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Nilufer Nourouzpour; Danielle Salomonczyk; Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Proprioceptive recalibration arises slowly compared to reach adaptation.

Authors:  Basel Zbib; Denise Y P Henriques; Erin K Cressman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Anticipation of future events improves the ability to estimate elapsed time.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Tsunoda; Shinji Kakei
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  One week of motor adaptation induces structural changes in primary motor cortex that predict long-term memory one year later.

Authors:  Sofia M Landi; Federico Baguear; Valeria Della-Maggiore
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Multiple motor learning strategies in visuomotor rotation.

Authors:  Naoki Saijo; Hiroaki Gomi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Learning arm/hand coordination with an altered visual input.

Authors:  Simona Denisia Iftime Nielsen; Strahinja Dosen; Mirjana B Popović; Dejan B Popović
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-19

10.  Speech perception under adverse conditions: insights from behavioral, computational, and neuroscience research.

Authors:  Sara Guediche; Sheila E Blumstein; Julie A Fiez; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.