Literature DB >> 16928153

Lack of effect of sex and disease state on the pharmacokinetics of porfimer sodium.

Jean-Marie Houle1, Nadine Clervoix, Stacey Bain, Jean Spénard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Porfimer sodium is an agent used for photodynamic therapy (PDT) of cancer and other pre-malignant conditions such as high grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus. Since it is activated by non-thermal red light after a 2-day time interval to allow distribution in the target tissues, its pharmacokinetic properties are relevant to the timing of light treatment and to the period of protection against photosensitivity reactions. With the recent availability of a reliable assay overcoming the limitations of previous assays, two definitive pharmacokinetic studies were undertaken.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if sex or a target disease state (cancer) have an effect on porfimer sodium pharmacokinetic parameters.
METHODS: Twenty-four healthy volunteers (12 men and 12 women) and five male patients with oesophageal cancer undergoing palliative PDT for their obstructive lesions were enrolled. All received an intravenous injection of porfimer sodium (Photofrin) 2 mg/kg over 3-5 minutes and underwent serial blood samplings over 35 days postdose. Porfimer sodium was quantified in serum by a validated spectrofluorometry assay and low-level pre-existing interference was subtracted from postdose concentrations.
RESULTS: The two sexes had comparable maximum serum concentrations with a ratio of 0.95. Women tended to have higher areas under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to the last sampling time, and from time zero to infinity than men, but the difference did not reach significance (ratios of means of 1.18 and 1.20, respectively). Elimination parameters also showed no sex-related differences with a mean distribution half-life of 9.5 hours, clearance of 0.88 mL/h/kg and a terminal elimination half-life of 415 hours (17.3 days). The sexes only differed significantly for the time to reach maximum serum concentration (means of 1.54 and 0.165 hours, for women and men, respectively; p = 0.0239). This is probably because of the sparse sampling schedule and the plateau behaviour of the initial concentrations. The pharmacokinetic parameters in cancer patients were generally comparable to healthy volunteers. However, the mean terminal elimination half-life was 30% shorter (283 hours or 11.8 days) in cancer patients.
CONCLUSION: Sex does not have an effect on porfimer sodium pharmacokinetics. The presence of advanced oesophageal cancer does not seem to have any influence either. These findings confirm that there is no need for sex-specific label recommendations. Also, the elimination phase of porfimer sodium starting progressively from 24 hours postdose supports the recommended time interval for laser light application, the window for PDT debridement and the skin protection period of at least 30 days.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16928153     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200645090-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  15 in total

1.  Photodynamic therapy in the management of bladder cancer.

Authors:  U O Nseyo
Journal:  J Clin Laser Med Surg       Date:  1996-10

2.  An assay for the quantitation of Photofrin in tissues and fluids.

Authors:  D A Bellnier; W R Greco; J C Parsons; A R Oseroff; A Kuebler; T J Dougherty
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.421

3.  Photobleaching of porphyrins used in photodynamic therapy and implications for therapy.

Authors:  T S Mang; T J Dougherty; W R Potter; D G Boyle; S Somer; J Moan
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.421

4.  Studies on the structure of porphyrins contained in Photofrin II.

Authors:  T J Dougherty
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.421

5.  The quantitative determination of Photofrin and Polyhaematoporphyrin in plasma: pitfalls and inaccuracies.

Authors:  D I Vernon; J A Holroyd; S M Stribbling; S B Brown
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.252

6.  Photodynamic therapy with porfimer sodium versus thermal ablation therapy with Nd:YAG laser for palliation of esophageal cancer: a multicenter randomized trial.

Authors:  C J Lightdale; S K Heier; N E Marcon; J S McCaughan; H Gerdes; B F Overholt; M V Sivak; G V Stiegmann; H R Nava
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Photodynamic therapy for dysplastic Barrett esophagus and early esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Herbert C Wolfsen; Timothy A Woodward; Massimo Raimondo
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  Role of neovasculature and vascular permeability on the tumor retention of photodynamic agents.

Authors:  W G Roberts; T Hasan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1992-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  A preliminary pharmacokinetic study of intravenous Photofrin in patients.

Authors:  D A Bellnier; T J Dougherty
Journal:  J Clin Laser Med Surg       Date:  1996-10

10.  Distribution and elimination of Photofrin II in mice.

Authors:  D A Bellnier; Y K Ho; R K Pandey; J R Missert; T J Dougherty
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.421

View more
  1 in total

1.  The pharmacokinetics and safety of porfimer after repeated administration 30-45 days apart to patients undergoing photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  S P Pereira; L Ayaru; R Ackroyd; D Mitton; G Fullarton; M Zammit; Z Grzebieniak; H Messmann; M-A Ortner; L Gao; M M Trinh; J Spénard
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 8.171

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.