Literature DB >> 16925754

Importance of peripheral biopsies in maximising the detection of early prostate cancer in repeat 12-core biopsy protocols.

Joe Philip1, Vishwanath Hanchanale, Christopher S Foster, Pradip Javlé.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess cancer-detection rates in repeat 12-core biopsy protocols, as extended multicore prostate biopsy protocols have become standard when investigating men with a raised prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, but repeat prostate biopsy protocols are still developing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a 4.5-year period, 241 of 590 patients with persistently high age-specific PSA levels of 2.6-10 ng/mL and an initial benign biopsy were invited for repeat transrectal ultrasonography-guided 12-core prostatic biopsy. The protocol for repeat biopsy was identical to the first biopsy, and included a periprostatic nerve block. The first six biopsies were obtained from the periphery of the gland directed more laterally at the base, mid-zone and apices. The remainder were parasagittal sextant biopsies. Pathological findings were analysed on an individual core basis.
RESULTS: The mean age of the 241 men was 63.4 years; cancer was diagnosed in 40 (16.6%) on repeat biopsy. Men with cancer were older and had a higher median PSA level. The median Gleason score was 6, with a median of two cores positive for cancer. Maximum cancer detection rates were from peripheral apices (37.5%), basal biopsies had the lowest detection rates (23.8% and 16.3%), and parasagittal biopsies missed 35% of detected cancers. Patients with cancer also had significantly lower prostate volumes and higher PSA densities (both P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: A low cancer yield from both peripheral basal and parasagittal basal specimens on repeat biopsy indicates adequate sampling at initial biopsy. The maximum cancer yield in the peripheral mid-zones and apical zones suggests the necessity for concentrated sampling of these zones in repeat biopsy protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16925754     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06325.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  8 in total

Review 1.  When prostate cancer remains undetectable: The dilemma.

Authors:  Mahmoud Othman Mustafa; Louis Pisters
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-03

Review 2.  Biopsy standards for detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bob Djavan; Markus Margreiter
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Fusion prostate biopsy outperforms 12-core systematic prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative systematic biopsy: A multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Abhinav Sidana; Matthew J Watson; Arvin K George; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Srinivas Vourganti; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Akhil Muthigi; Mahir Maruf; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Jeffrey W Nix; Maria J Merino; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Novel contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Martijn Smeenge; Massimo Mischi; M Pilar Laguna Pes; Jean J M C H de la Rosette; Hessel Wijkstra
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Systematic analysis of transrectal prostate biopsies using an ink method and specific histopathologic protocol: a prospective study.

Authors:  David Parada; Nahum Calvo; Karla Peña; Vanesa Morente; Rosana Queralt; Pilar Hernandez; Francesc Riu
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2011-06-09

6.  Repeat Targeted Prostate Biopsy under Guidance of Multiparametric MRI-Correlated Real-Time Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Patients with Previous Negative Biopsy and Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Dong Ryul Jang; Dae Chul Jung; Young Taik Oh; Songmi Noh; Kyunghwa Han; Kiwook Kim; Koon-Ho Rha; Young Deuk Choi; Sung Joon Hong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy: present and future.

Authors:  Chan Kyo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Can we improve the detection rate of prostate cancer using standard 12-core TRUS-guided prostate biopsy? Focused on the location of prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Sangjun Yoo; Jungyo Suh; Juhyun Park; Min Chul Cho; Hwancheol Son; Hyeon Jeong
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-04-12       Impact factor: 4.452

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.