OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the repeatability and reproducibility of the different tests of a clinical test battery evaluating the components of functional spinal stability: postural control (sway velocity data), proprioception (repositioning error), and muscle activation (electromyographic data). DESIGN: A total of 28 healthy volunteers participated in this study: 14 in the repeatability study and 14 in the reproducibility study. Each subject was tested three times, with an interval of 1 wk between the test sessions. The intraclass correlation coefficients and the standard error of the measurements as a percentage of the grand mean were calculated. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficients for both the repeatability and the reproducibility evaluation showed good to excellent reliability for all variables (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.60-0.98). The standard error of the measurements as a percentage of the grand mean ranged from 0.004 to 19.94. CONCLUSIONS: The functional clinical test battery investigated in this study proved to be a reliable tool in the assessment of healthy subjects. The evaluation of postural control, proprioception, and muscle activity (coordination, stabilization, maximal voluntary isometric contraction, endurance, and flexion-relaxation) showed good to excellent repeatability and reproducibility. Further analysis of the reliability of these variables in a clinical setting, particularly in patients with low back pain, seems appropriate.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the repeatability and reproducibility of the different tests of a clinical test battery evaluating the components of functional spinal stability: postural control (sway velocity data), proprioception (repositioning error), and muscle activation (electromyographic data). DESIGN: A total of 28 healthy volunteers participated in this study: 14 in the repeatability study and 14 in the reproducibility study. Each subject was tested three times, with an interval of 1 wk between the test sessions. The intraclass correlation coefficients and the standard error of the measurements as a percentage of the grand mean were calculated. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficients for both the repeatability and the reproducibility evaluation showed good to excellent reliability for all variables (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.60-0.98). The standard error of the measurements as a percentage of the grand mean ranged from 0.004 to 19.94. CONCLUSIONS: The functional clinical test battery investigated in this study proved to be a reliable tool in the assessment of healthy subjects. The evaluation of postural control, proprioception, and muscle activity (coordination, stabilization, maximal voluntary isometric contraction, endurance, and flexion-relaxation) showed good to excellent repeatability and reproducibility. Further analysis of the reliability of these variables in a clinical setting, particularly in patients with low back pain, seems appropriate.
Authors: Thomas Palmer; Timothy L Uhl; Dana Howell; Timothy E Hewett; Kert Viele; Carl G Mattacola Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2015-04-06 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Stijn Schouppe; Lieven Danneels; Stefaan Van Damme; Sophie Van Oosterwijck; Tanneke Palmans; Jessica Van Oosterwijck Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2019-09-13 Impact factor: 1.972