Literature DB >> 31520099

Physical and cognitive exertion do not influence feedforward activation of the trunk muscles: a randomized crossover trial.

Stijn Schouppe1,2, Lieven Danneels3, Stefaan Van Damme4, Sophie Van Oosterwijck1, Tanneke Palmans1, Jessica Van Oosterwijck1,2,5.   

Abstract

Fatigue arises during everyday activities, diminishes movement performance, and increases injury risk. Physical (PE) and cognitive exertion (CE) can induce similar feelings of fatigue, but it is not clear whether these also similarly affect movement performance. Therefore, this study examined the influence of PE and CE on anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) of trunk muscles, which are feedforward mechanisms that contribute to motor control and controlled movement. Rapid arm movement tasks (RAM) were used to induce APAs of the trunk muscles prior and following three experimental conditions in 20 healthy adults: seated rest without exertion (NE), a combined isometric modified Biering-Sörensen and static abdominal curl to induce PE, and a modified incongruent Stroop colour-word task to induce CE. Fatigue was assessed using self-reported measures, and APA onset latencies of the trunk muscles with surface electromyography. Statistical analyses revealed that neither PE nor CE influence APAs of the trunk. Therefore, it is hypothesized that the influence of fatigue on movement performance might not be through altered motor control, but rather by reduced motivation. However, the possibility that fatigue might influence other mechanisms which contribute to trunk motor control, such as APA amplitude and variability, cannot be excluded and need further examination.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticipatory postural adjustments; Electromyography; Exertion; Sensorimotor control

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31520099     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05585-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  63 in total

1.  Assessment of physical activity: an international perspective.

Authors:  M Booth
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Core muscle response times and postural reactions in soccer players and nonplayers.

Authors:  Arend Jan Borghuis; Koen A P M Lemmink; At L Hof
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Time-on-task and sleep deprivation effects are evidenced in overlapping brain areas.

Authors:  Christopher L Asplund; Michael W L Chee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Effects of ankle and hip muscle fatigue on postural sway and attentional demands during unipedal stance.

Authors:  Etienne J Bisson; Daniel McEwen; Yves Lajoie; Martin Bilodeau
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Trunk muscle fatigue during a back extension task in standing.

Authors:  G T Allison; S M Henry
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2001-11

6.  Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion.

Authors:  G A Borg
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 7.  Exercise and fatigue.

Authors:  Wim Ament; Gijsbertus J Verkerke
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Assessment of muscle load and fatigue with the usage of frequency and time-frequency analysis of the EMG signal.

Authors:  Paweł Bartuzi; Danuta Roman-Liu
Journal:  Acta Bioeng Biomech       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.073

Review 9.  Mental fatigue: costs and benefits.

Authors:  Maarten A S Boksem; Mattie Tops
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2008-07-09

Review 10.  Physical and cognitive consequences of fatigue: A review.

Authors:  Hoda M Abd-Elfattah; Faten H Abdelazeim; Shorouk Elshennawy
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 10.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.