Literature DB >> 16920416

Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusceptions by saline enema: a review of 5218 cases in 17 years.

Yu Zuo Bai1, Ri Bin Qu, Guang Da Wang, Ke Ren Zhang, Yong Li, Ying Huang, Zhi Bo Zhang, Shu Cheng Zhang, Hai Lan Zhang, Xin Zhou, Wei Lin Wang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of ultrasound (US)-guided hydrostatic reduction (UGSED) of intussusceptions in pediatric patients by saline enema.
METHODS: Five thousand two hundred eighteen pediatric patients with intussusceptions treated by UGSED from October 1985 to October 2002 were reviewed retrospectively.
RESULTS: The success rate of reduction in 5218 patients was 95.5%. Two hundred thirty-seven patients (4.5%) underwent surgery. Colonic perforation occurred in 9 patients (0.17%). Two infants suffered from milk aspiration because of vomiting during the hydrostatic enema reduction. There was no mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: UGSED of intussusceptions avoids radiation exposure. It is reliable and safe. It has high success rate and minimal complications. It is a perfect method for the nonoperative treatment of pediatric intussusception and can be widely used as routine therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16920416     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  18 in total

Review 1.  Radiation safety.

Authors:  Donald P Frush
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-06

Review 2.  Intussusception: past, present and future.

Authors:  Emily A Edwards; Nicholas Pigg; Jesse Courtier; Matthew A Zapala; John D MacKenzie; Andrew S Phelps
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-08-04

3.  Risk factors for short-term recurrent intussusception and reduction failure after ultrasound-guided saline enema.

Authors:  Gang Shen; Chuanguang Zhang; Junfeng Li; Jing Zhang; Yongdong Liu; Zheming Guan; Qiang Hu
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 4.  Reduction of intussusception: defining a better index of successful non-operative treatment.

Authors:  Basil Bekdash; Sean S Marven; Alan Sprigg
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-12-20

5.  Ultrasound-guided reduction of intussusception: a safe and effective method performed by pediatric surgeons.

Authors:  Stefan Gfroerer; Henning Fiegel; Udo Rolle
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Implementing ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception in a low-resource country in Sub-Saharan Africa: our initial experience in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Eyasu Wakjira; Samuel Sisay; Jonathan Zember; Daniel Zewdneh; Yocabel Gorfu; Tesfaye Kebede; Amezene Tadesse; Kassa Darge
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2017-08-24

7.  Sonography-guided hydrostatic reduction of ileocolic intussusception in children: analysis of failure and success in consecutive patients presenting timely to the hospital.

Authors:  Jan Menke; Fritz Kahl
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  Ultrasound-guided Hartmann's solution enema: first-choice procedure for reducing idiopathic intussusception.

Authors:  D Di Renzo; M Colangelo; G Lauriti; F De Girolamo; A Persico; P Lelli Chiesa
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Air enema for intussusception: is predicting the outcome important?

Authors:  P Ramachandran; A Gupta; P Vincent; S Sridharan
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 1.827

10.  Ultrasound guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception in children by saline enema: our experience.

Authors:  Debashish Nayak; S Jagdish
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 0.656

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.