Literature DB >> 16919346

The development of stop-signal and Go/Nogo response inhibition in children aged 7-12 years: performance and event-related potential indices.

Stuart J Johnstone1, Aneta Dimoska, Janette L Smith, Robert J Barry, Carly B Pleffer, Dale Chiswick, Adam R Clarke.   

Abstract

The present study examined the development of response inhibition during the Stop-signal and Go/Nogo tasks in children using performance and ERP measures. Twenty-four children aged 7 to 12 years completed both tasks, each with an auditory Nogo/Stop-signal presented on 30% of trials. On average, response inhibition was more difficult in the Stop-signal than Go/Nogo task. Response inhibition performance did not develop significantly across the age range, while response execution varied significantly in a task dependent manner (Go/Nogo: increasing accuracy and reducing response variability with age; Stop-signal: reducing Go mean reaction time and response variability with age). The N1, P2, N2 and P3 components showed different scalp distributions, with N1 and P2 peaking earlier, and P3 later, in Nogo compared to Stop stimuli. N2 and P3 amplitude were positively correlated with successful inhibition probability in the Go/Nogo task only. N2 amplitude and latency to both Nogo and successful Stop stimuli decreased linearly with age, but not in the frontal regions. N1 and P3 amplitude in the parietal region increased with age for Stop-signals. An age-related reduction in P3 latency to Nogo stimuli correlated significantly with reduced RT and variability in Go responding, indicating a relationship between efficient Nogo and Go processing. Together the behavioural and ERP results suggest little development of the response inhibition process as measured via the Stop-signal and Go/Nogo tasks across the 7 to 12 year age range, while response execution processes develop substantially.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16919346     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  47 in total

1.  From ERPs to Academics.

Authors:  Charles H Hillman; Matthew B Pontifex; Robert W Motl; Kevin C O'Leary; Christopher R Johnson; Mark R Scudder; Lauren B Raine; Darla M Castelli
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 6.464

Review 2.  A developmental perspective on executive function.

Authors:  John R Best; Patricia H Miller
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec

3.  Neurodynamic correlates of response inhibition from emerging to mid adulthood.

Authors:  Martina Knežević; Ksenija Marinković
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2017-03-21

4.  The role of the cingulate cortex as neural generator of the N200 and P300 in a tactile response inhibition task.

Authors:  R J Huster; R Westerhausen; C Pantev; C Konrad
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Brain functional domains inform therapeutic interventions in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and pediatric bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Alessandra M Passarotti; Mani N Pavuluri
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.618

Review 6.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of inhibition: cognitive control, source localization and age-related modulations.

Authors:  Luís Pires; José Leitão; Chiara Guerrini; Mário R Simões
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 7.444

7.  How semantic categorization influences inhibitory processing in middle-childhood: an Event Related Potentials study.

Authors:  Mandy J Maguire; Joshua White; Matthew R Brier
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Frontal white matter damage impairs response inhibition in children following traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Jonathan Lipszyc; Harvey Levin; Gerri Hanten; Jill Hunter; Maureen Dennis; Russell Schachar
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.813

9.  Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition.

Authors:  Michael D Guthrie; Donald L Gilbert; David A Huddleston; Ernest V Pedapati; Paul S Horn; Stewart H Mostofsky; Steve W Wu
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  One-year developmental stability and covariance among oddball, novelty, go/no-go, and flanker event-related potentials in adolescence: A monozygotic twin study.

Authors:  Scott J Burwell; Stephen M Malone; William G Iacono
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.