| Literature DB >> 16918922 |
Abstract
With medical costs escalating over recent years, cost analysis is being conducted more and more to assess economic impact of new treatment options. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) is a measure that assesses the additional cost for a new treatment for each additional unit of effectiveness, such as saving 1 year of life. In this article, we consider cost-effectiveness analysis for new treatments evaluated in a randomized clinical trial setting with staggered entries. In particular, the censoring times are different for cost and survival data. We propose a method for estimating the ICER and obtaining its confidence interval when differential censoring exists. Simulation experiments are conducted to evaluate our proposed method. We also apply our methods to a clinical trial example comparing the cost-effectiveness of implanted defibrillators with conventional therapy for individuals with reduced left ventricular function after myocardial infarction.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16918922 DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00502.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biometrics ISSN: 0006-341X Impact factor: 2.571