Literature DB >> 26010599

Median-based incremental cost-effectiveness ratios with censored data.

Heejung Bang1, Hongwei Zhao2.   

Abstract

Cost-effectiveness is an essential part of treatment evaluation, in addition to effectiveness. In the cost-effectiveness analysis, a measure called the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) is widely utilized, and the mean cost and the mean (quality-adjusted) life years have served as norms to summarize cost and effectiveness for a study population. Recently, the median-based ICER was proposed for complementary or sensitivity analysis purposes. In this article, we extend this method when some data are censored.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Censoring; ICER; cost-effectiveness analysis; median

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26010599      PMCID: PMC4816674          DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2015.1052482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.051


  31 in total

1.  On estimating medical cost and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios with censored data.

Authors:  H Zhao; L Tian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Using inverse-weighting in cost-effectiveness analysis with censored data.

Authors:  A R Willan; D Y Lin; R J Cook; E B Chen
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Median regression with censored cost data.

Authors:  Heejung Bang; Anastasios A Tsiatis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The CE plane: a graphic representation of cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  W C Black
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1990 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 5.  Good research practices for cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials: the ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force report.

Authors:  Scott Ramsey; Richard Willke; Andrew Briggs; Ruth Brown; Martin Buxton; Anita Chawla; John Cook; Henry Glick; Bengt Liljas; Diana Petitti; Shelby Reed
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 6.  Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Authors:  M C Weinstein; J E Siegel; M R Gold; M S Kamlet; L B Russell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The usefulness of average cost-effective ratios.

Authors:  E M Laska; M Meisner; C Siegel
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction.

Authors:  Arthur J Moss; Wojciech Zareba; W Jackson Hall; Helmut Klein; David J Wilber; David S Cannom; James P Daubert; Steven L Higgins; Mary W Brown; Mark L Andrews
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Cost-effectiveness analysis: a proposal of new reporting standards in statistical analysis.

Authors:  Heejung Bang; Hongwei Zhao
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.051

10.  Cost analysis with censored data.

Authors:  Yijian Huang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  1 in total

1.  Pharmacoeconomic comparison of aripiprazole once-monthly and paliperidone palmitate from a head-to-head clinical trial in schizophrenia: a US analysis.

Authors:  Christophe Sapin; Ann Hartry; Siddhesh A Kamat; Maud Beillat; Ross A Baker; Anna Eramo
Journal:  Drugs Context       Date:  2016-09-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.