Literature DB >> 16918134

Tumor size as predictor of microinvasion, invasion, and axillary metastasis in ductal carcinoma in situ.

A Maffuz1, S Barroso-Bravo, I Nájera, G Zarco, I Alvarado-Cabrero, S A Rodríguez-Cuevas.   

Abstract

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents a small number of cases in countries with inadequate breast cancer screening programs, and in the majority of cases is diagnosed as a palpable lump. It has been proposed that DCIS with palpable lump > or = 2.5 cm can be associated with microinvasion or invasive carcinoma and risk of axillary metastasis. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate incidence of microinvasion, invasion, and the role of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in DCIS > or = 2.5 cm. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with histologically proven incisional, excisional, or core biopsy of DCIS lump > or = 2.5 cm at a tertiary-care hospital. All patients underwent lymphatic mapping with sentinel lymph node biopsy.A total of 24 patients were included with average tumor size of 4 cm (range, 2.5-6 cm); 29% had microinvasive and 12.5% had invasive disease, three patients (12.5%) had positive sentinel lymph node, all had micrometastasis, and no metastasis were found in non-sentinel lymph nodes. Incidence of microinvasion and invasion were directly related with tumor size (10% for DCIS tumor size of 2.5-3.5 cm, 57% for 3.6-4.5 cm, and 71% for tumors between 4.5 and 6 cm). In addition, axillary metastasis incidence had a direct relationship with tumor size. (0% in 2.5-3.5-cm tumor size, 14% for 3.6-4.5 cm, and 28% in DCIS between 4.6 and 6.0 cm). The present study shows high incidence of microinvasion and invasion in DCIS diagnosed in tumors > or = 2.5 cm and supports the importance of axillary evaluation in patients with tumors >3.5 cm by means of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16918134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 0392-9078


  12 in total

1.  Attenuation correction for flexible magnetic resonance coils in combined magnetic resonance/positron emission tomography imaging.

Authors:  Mootaz Eldib; Jason Bini; Claudia Calcagno; Philip M Robson; Venkatesh Mani; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  A New Robust Method for Nonlinear Regression.

Authors:  M A Tabatabai; J J Kengwoung-Keumo; W M Eby; S Bae; U Manne; M Fouad; K P Singh
Journal:  J Biom Biostat       Date:  2014

3.  Comparative Effectiveness of Surgical Options for Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: An Instrumental Variable Approach.

Authors:  Lewei Duan; Aniket A Kawatkar
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2018

Review 4.  The impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging on important outcomes among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Todd M Tuttle; Tatyana Shamliyan; Beth A Virnig; Robert L Kane
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

5.  The presentation, management and outcome of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with microinvasion (invasion ≤1 mm in size)-results from the UK Sloane Project.

Authors:  Abeer M Shaaban; Bridget Hilton; Karen Clements; David Dodwell; Nisha Sharma; Cliona Kirwan; Elinor Sawyer; Anthony Maxwell; Matthew Wallis; Hilary Stobart; Senthurun Mylvaganam; Janet Litherland; Samantha Brace-McDonnell; Joanne Dulson-Cox; Olive Kearins; Elena Provenzano; Ian O Ellis; Sarah E Pinder; Alastair M Thompson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 9.075

6.  Role of primary tumor characteristics in predicting positive sentinel lymph nodes in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ or microinvasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Min Yi; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Henry M Kuerer; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Isabelle Bedrosian; Merrick I Ross; Frederick C Ames; Anthony Lucci; Rosa F Hwang; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  The thyroid status reprograms T cell lymphoma growth and modulates immune cell frequencies.

Authors:  H A Sterle; M L Barreiro Arcos; E Valli; M A Paulazo; S P Méndez Huergo; A G Blidner; F Cayrol; M C Díaz Flaqué; A J Klecha; V A Medina; L Colombo; G A Rabinovich; G A Cremaschi
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Regulation of DCIS to invasive breast cancer progression by Singleminded-2s (SIM2s).

Authors:  K C Scribner; F Behbod; W W Porter
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  High and intermediate grade ductal carcinoma in-situ of the breast: a comparison of pathologic features in core biopsies and excisions and an evaluation of core biopsy features that may predict a close or positive margin in the excision.

Authors:  Oluwole Fadare; Nathan F Clement; Mohiedean Ghofrani
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 2.644

Review 10.  Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Biology, Biomarkers, and Diagnosis.

Authors:  Kylie L Gorringe; Stephen B Fox
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.