Literature DB >> 16917857

Dispersion and repulsion contributions to the solvation free energy: comparison of quantum mechanical and classical approaches in the polarizable continuum model.

Carles Curutchet1, Modesto Orozco, F Javier Luque, Benedetta Mennucci, Jacopo Tomasi.   

Abstract

We report a systematic comparison of the dispersion and repulsion contributions to the free energy of solvation determined using quantum mechanical self-consistent reaction field (QM-SCRF) and classical methods. In particular, QM-SCRF computations have been performed using the dispersion and repulsion expressions developed in the framework of the integral equation formalism of the polarizable continuum model, whereas classical methods involve both empirical pairwise potential and surface-dependent approaches. Calculations have been performed for a series of aliphatic and aromatic compounds containing prototypical functional groups in four solvents: water, octanol, chloroform, and carbon tetrachloride. The analysis is focused on the dependence of the dispersion and repulsion components on the level of theory used in QM-SCRF computations, the contribution of those terms in different solvents, and the magnitude of the coupling between electrostatic and dispersion-repulsion components. Finally, comparison is made between the dispersion-repulsion contributions obtained from QM-SCRF calculations and the results determined from classical approaches. Copyright 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16917857     DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  7 in total

1.  Dispersion terms and analysis of size- and charge dependence in an enhanced Poisson-Boltzmann approach.

Authors:  Parimal Kar; Max Seel; Ulrich H E Hansmann; Siegfried Höfinger
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  How accurate are continuum solvation models for drug-like molecules?

Authors:  Jacob Kongsted; Pär Söderhjelm; Ulf Ryde
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Performance of the SMD and SM8 models for predicting solvation free energy of neutral solutes in methanol, dimethyl sulfoxide and acetonitrile.

Authors:  Caroline C Zanith; Josefredo R Pliego
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 4.  Biomolecular electrostatics and solvation: a computational perspective.

Authors:  Pengyu Ren; Jaehun Chun; Dennis G Thomas; Michael J Schnieders; Marcelo Marucho; Jiajing Zhang; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.318

5.  Performance of the IEF-MST solvation continuum model in the SAMPL2 blind test prediction of hydration and tautomerization free energies.

Authors:  Ignacio Soteras; Modesto Orozco; F Javier Luque
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Pentacycloundecane lactam vs lactone norstatine type protease HIV inhibitors: binding energy calculations and DFT study.

Authors:  Bahareh Honarparvar; Sachin A Pawar; Cláudio Nahum Alves; Jerônimo Lameira; Glenn Em Maguire; José Rogério A Silva; Thavendran Govender; Hendrik G Kruger
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 8.410

7.  Quantum Vibrational Spectroscopy of Explicitly Solvated Thymidine in Semiclassical Approximation.

Authors:  Fabio Gabas; Riccardo Conte; Michele Ceotto
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 6.475

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.