Literature DB >> 16917649

Assessing country-level efforts to link research to action.

John N Lavis1, Jonathan Lomas, Maimunah Hamid, Nelson K Sewankambo.   

Abstract

We developed a framework for assessing country-level efforts to link research to action. The framework has four elements. The first element assesses the general climate (how those who fund research, universities, researchers and users of research support or place value on efforts to link research to action). The second element addresses the production of research (how priority setting ensures that users' needs are identified and how scoping reviews, systematic reviews and single studies are undertaken to address these needs). The third element addresses the mix of four clusters of activities used to link research to action. These include push efforts (how strategies are used to support action based on the messages arising from research), efforts to facilitate "user pull" (how "one-stop shopping" is provided for optimally packaged high-quality reviews either alone or as part of a national electronic library for health, how these reviews are profiled during "teachable moments" such as intense media coverage, and how rapid-response units meet users' needs for the best research), "user pull" efforts undertaken by those who use research (how users assess their capacity to use research and how structures and processes are changed to support the use of research) and exchange efforts (how meaningful partnerships between researchers and users help them to jointly ask and answer relevant questions). The fourth element addresses approaches to evaluation (how support is provided for rigorous evaluations of efforts to link research to action).

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16917649      PMCID: PMC2627430          DOI: 10.2471/blt.06.030312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull World Health Organ        ISSN: 0042-9686            Impact factor:   9.408


  161 in total

1.  Perceptions of evidence-based programs among community-based organizations tackling health disparities: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Shoba Ramanadhan; Josephine Crisostomo; Jaclyn Alexander-Molloy; Ediss Gandelman; Milagro Grullon; Vilma Lora; Chrasandra Reeves; Clara Savage; Kasisomayajula Viswanath
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2011-10-19

2.  Relationship of electronic medical knowledge resource use and practice characteristics with Internal Medicine Maintenance of Certification Examination scores.

Authors:  Darcy A Reed; Colin P West; Eric S Holmboe; Andrew J Halvorsen; Rebecca S Lipner; Carola Jacobs; Furman S McDonald
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  From research to public policy: an essential extension of the translation research agenda.

Authors:  David M Mirvis
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.689

Review 4.  Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature.

Authors:  Craig Mitton; Carol E Adair; Emily McKenzie; Scott B Patten; Brenda Waye Perry
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Evidence for public health decision-making: towards reliable synthesis.

Authors:  Elizabeth Waters
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.408

6.  Funding agencies in low- and middle-income countries: support for knowledge translation.

Authors:  Cynthia Cordero; Rachel Delino; L Jeyaseelan; Mary Ann Lansang; Juan M Lozano; Shuba Kumar; Socorro Moreno; Merle Pietersen; Jose Quirino; Visanu Thamlikitkul; Vivian A Welch; Jacqueline Tetroe; Aleida Ter Kuile; Ian D Graham; Jeremy Grimshaw; Vic Neufeld; George Wells; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  Evidence briefs and deliberative dialogues: perceptions and intentions to act on what was learnt.

Authors:  Kaelan A Moat; John N Lavis; Sarah J Clancy; Fadi El-Jardali; Tomas Pantoja
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 8.  How contexts and issues influence the use of policy-relevant research syntheses: a critical interpretive synthesis.

Authors:  Kaelan A Moat; John N Lavis; Julia Abelson
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.911

9.  Making haste slowly: the response to the Shipman Inquiry?

Authors:  Richard Baker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Critical appraisal training increases understanding and confidence and enhances the use of evidence in diverse categories of learners.

Authors:  Donna H Odierna; Jenny White; Susan Forsyth; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.