BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It is well known that the vulnerable atheromatous plaque has a thin, fibrous cap and large lipid core with associated inflammation. This inflammation can be detected on MRI with use of a contrast medium, Sinerem, an ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO). Although the incidence of macrophage activity in asymptomatic disease appears low, we aimed to explore the incidence of MRI-defined inflammation in asymptomatic plaques in patients with known contralateral symptomatic disease. METHODS: Twenty symptomatic patients underwent multisequence MRI before and 36 hours after USPIO infusion. Images were manually segmented into quadrants, and the signal change in each quadrant was calculated after USPIO administration. A mixed mathematical model was developed to compare the mean signal change across all quadrants in the 2 groups. Patients had a mean symptomatic stenosis of 77% compared with 46% on their asymptomatic side, as measured by conventional angiography. RESULTS: There were 11 (55%) men, and the median age was 72 years (range, 53 to 84 years). All patients had risk factors consistent with severe atherosclerotic disease. All symptomatic carotid stenoses had inflammation, as evaluated by USPIO-enhanced imaging. On the contralateral sides, inflammatory activity was found in 19 (95%) patients. Contralaterally, there were 163 quadrants (57%) with a signal loss after USPIO when compared with 217 quadrants (71%) on the symptomatic side (P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: This study adds weight to the argument that atherosclerosis is a truly systemic disease. It suggests that investigation of the contralateral side in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis can demonstrate inflammation in 95% of plaques, despite a mean stenosis of only 46%. Thus, inflammatory activity may be a significant risk factor in asymptomatic disease in patients who have known contralateral symptomatic disease. Patients with symptomatic carotid disease should have their contralateral carotid artery followed up.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It is well known that the vulnerable atheromatous plaque has a thin, fibrous cap and large lipid core with associated inflammation. This inflammation can be detected on MRI with use of a contrast medium, Sinerem, an ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO). Although the incidence of macrophage activity in asymptomatic disease appears low, we aimed to explore the incidence of MRI-defined inflammation in asymptomatic plaques in patients with known contralateral symptomatic disease. METHODS: Twenty symptomatic patients underwent multisequence MRI before and 36 hours after USPIO infusion. Images were manually segmented into quadrants, and the signal change in each quadrant was calculated after USPIO administration. A mixed mathematical model was developed to compare the mean signal change across all quadrants in the 2 groups. Patients had a mean symptomatic stenosis of 77% compared with 46% on their asymptomatic side, as measured by conventional angiography. RESULTS: There were 11 (55%) men, and the median age was 72 years (range, 53 to 84 years). All patients had risk factors consistent with severe atherosclerotic disease. All symptomatic carotid stenoses had inflammation, as evaluated by USPIO-enhanced imaging. On the contralateral sides, inflammatory activity was found in 19 (95%) patients. Contralaterally, there were 163 quadrants (57%) with a signal loss after USPIO when compared with 217 quadrants (71%) on the symptomatic side (P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: This study adds weight to the argument that atherosclerosis is a truly systemic disease. It suggests that investigation of the contralateral side in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis can demonstrate inflammation in 95% of plaques, despite a mean stenosis of only 46%. Thus, inflammatory activity may be a significant risk factor in asymptomatic disease in patients who have known contralateral symptomatic disease. Patients with symptomatic carotid disease should have their contralateral carotid artery followed up.
Authors: Stephan Metz; Ambros J Beer; Marcus Settles; Jaroslav Pelisek; René M Botnar; Ernst J Rummeny; Peter Heider Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-10-24 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Jason S Weinstein; Csanad G Varallyay; Edit Dosa; Seymur Gahramanov; Bronwyn Hamilton; William D Rooney; Leslie L Muldoon; Edward A Neuwelt Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: C Kaneko; N Nitta; K Tsuchiya; S Watanabe; A Nitta-Seko; S Ohta; H Otani; A Sonoda; K Murata; M Shiomi Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2015-06-17 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Tjun Y Tang; Simon P S Howarth; Sam R Miller; Martin J Graves; Jean-Marie U-King-Im; Rikin A Trivedi; Zhi Yong Li; Stewart R Walsh; Andrew P Brown; Peter J Kirkpatrick; Michael E Gaunt; Jonathan H Gillard Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2007-06-19 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Michael A Bruckman; Lauren N Randolph; Neetu M Gulati; Phoebe L Stewart; Nicole F Steinmetz Journal: J Mater Chem B Date: 2015-07-22 Impact factor: 6.331