BACKGROUND: Inflammation is a recognised risk factor for the vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque. The aim of this study was to explore whether there is a difference in the degree of magnetic resonance (MR) defined inflammation using ultra small superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) particles within carotid atheroma in completely asymptomatic individuals and the asymptomatic carotid stenosis contralateral to the symptomatic side. METHODS: 20 symptomatic patients with contralateral disease and 20 completely asymptomatic patients underwent multi-sequence MR imaging before and 36 h after USPIO infusion. Images were manually segmented into quadrants and signal change in each quadrant was calculated following USPIO administration. Mean signal change was compared across all quadrants in the two groups. RESULTS: The mean percentage of quadrants showing signal loss was 53% in the contralateral group compared with 31% in completely asymptomatic individuals (p = 0.025). The mean percentages showing enhancement were 44% and 65%, respectively (p = 0.024). The mean signal difference between the two groups was 8.6% (95% CI 1.6% to 15.6%; p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Truly asymptomatic plaques seem to demonstrate inflammation but not to the extent of the contralateral asymptomatic stenosis to the symptomatic side. Inflammatory activity may be a significant risk factor in asymptomatic disease.
BACKGROUND:Inflammation is a recognised risk factor for the vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque. The aim of this study was to explore whether there is a difference in the degree of magnetic resonance (MR) defined inflammation using ultra small superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) particles within carotid atheroma in completely asymptomatic individuals and the asymptomatic carotid stenosis contralateral to the symptomatic side. METHODS: 20 symptomatic patients with contralateral disease and 20 completely asymptomatic patients underwent multi-sequence MR imaging before and 36 h after USPIO infusion. Images were manually segmented into quadrants and signal change in each quadrant was calculated following USPIO administration. Mean signal change was compared across all quadrants in the two groups. RESULTS: The mean percentage of quadrants showing signal loss was 53% in the contralateral group compared with 31% in completely asymptomatic individuals (p = 0.025). The mean percentages showing enhancement were 44% and 65%, respectively (p = 0.024). The mean signal difference between the two groups was 8.6% (95% CI 1.6% to 15.6%; p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Truly asymptomatic plaques seem to demonstrate inflammation but not to the extent of the contralateral asymptomatic stenosis to the symptomatic side. Inflammatory activity may be a significant risk factor in asymptomatic disease.
Authors: T Saam; M S Ferguson; V L Yarnykh; N Takaya; D Xu; N L Polissar; T S Hatsukami; C Yuan Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2004-11-04 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Rikin A Trivedi; Chinthake Mallawarachi; Jean-Marie U-King-Im; Martin J Graves; Jo Horsley; Martin J Goddard; Andrew Brown; Liqun Wang; Peter J Kirkpatrick; John Brown; Jonathan H Gillard Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2006-04-20 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Tjun Tang; Simon P S Howarth; Sam R Miller; Rikin Trivedi; Martin J Graves; Jean U King-Im; Zhi Y Li; Andrew P Brown; Peter J Kirkpatrick; Michael E Gaunt; Jonathan H Gillard Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-08-17 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Imad Nadra; Justin C Mason; Pandelis Philippidis; Oliver Florey; Cheryl D W Smythe; Geraldine M McCarthy; Robert C Landis; Dorian O Haskard Journal: Circ Res Date: 2005-05-19 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Norihide Takaya; Chun Yuan; Baocheng Chu; Tobias Saam; Nayak L Polissar; Gail P Jarvik; Carol Isaac; Judith McDonough; Cynthia Natiello; Randy Small; Marina S Ferguson; Thomas S Hatsukami Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-05-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: C D Irvine; S E Cole; P X Foley; S T Brookes; M Morgan; Y Wilson; J Hayward; R N Baird; P M Lamont Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: Norihide Takaya; Chun Yuan; Baocheng Chu; Tobias Saam; Hunter Underhill; Jianming Cai; Nam Tran; Nayak L Polissar; Carol Isaac; Marina S Ferguson; Gwenn A Garden; Steven C Cramer; Kenneth R Maravilla; Beverly Hashimoto; Thomas S Hatsukami Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-02-09 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Dominik Nörenberg; Hans U Ebersberger; Gerd Diederichs; Bernd Hamm; René M Botnar; Marcus R Makowski Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-07-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Alkystis Phinikaridou; Marcelo E Andia; Ajay M Shah; René M Botnar Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2012-10-12 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Shirjel R Alam; Colin Stirrat; Jennifer Richards; Saeed Mirsadraee; Scott I K Semple; George Tse; Peter Henriksen; David E Newby Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 5.364