Literature DB >> 16916119

Nonclinical outcomes of hospital-based palliative care.

Kenneth R White1, Kristie G Stover, J Brian Cassel, Thomas J Smith.   

Abstract

Evidence-based outcomes are commonly used in making decisions about clinical care. For healthcare executives, evidence-based outcomes also can be useful in making decisions about hospital services. Finkler and Ward (2003) suggest a model whereby cost measurement, cost control, and value assessment can be used as nonclinical, evidence-based outcome measures to provide decision support and to guide management decisions. The Finkler and Ward framework is used to understand the financial implications of establishing an inpatient palliative care unit (PCU). A longitudinal study was conducted to examine the nonclinical outcomes associated with opening and operating an inpatient PCU at a large academic medical center during the first four years of the unit's operation. First, the cost of providing inpatient palliative care was measured. Results indicated that the cost per day to care for patients hospitalized in the last 20 days leading up to their death was significantly less on the PCU than on intensive care units and non-PCUs. Average daily total charges exceeded reimbursement on the ICU and non-PCUs, but the cost on the PCU for the same population was equal to or below the average daily total charges. Second, ways to control costs when operating an inpatient PCU were identified and measured. Evidence from one organization suggests that costs can effectively be controlled by admitting patients directly to the PCU and by appropriate use of hospital resources, including staff, ancillary services, and pharmaceuticals. Third, the study assessed the value to the institution of operating an inpatient PCU. Results indicated that the inpatient PCU yielded a cost savings of nearly 1 million dollars by the third year of operations. This study highlights the nonclinical outcomes of one institution's inpatient PCU and provides guidelines for healthcare executives and managers to use in making decisions about adopting such programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16916119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Healthc Manag        ISSN: 1096-9012


  5 in total

Review 1.  Palliative care in advanced cancer patients: how and when?

Authors:  Eduardo Bruera; Sriram Yennurajalingam
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-01-17

2.  Pain or fatigue: which correlates more with suffering in hospitalized cancer patients?

Authors:  Mellar P Davis; Lisa A Rybicki; Renato V Samala; Chirag Patel; Armida Parala-Metz; Ruth Lagman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  The Ambulatory and Home Care Record: A Methodological Framework for Economic Analyses in End-of-Life Care.

Authors:  Denise N Guerriere; Peter C Coyte
Journal:  J Aging Res       Date:  2011-05-19

4.  Impact of a home-based social welfare program on care for palliative patients in the Basque Country (SAIATU Program).

Authors:  Emilio Herrera Molina; Roberto Nuño-Solinis; Gorka Espiau Idioaga; Silvia Librada Flores; Naomi Hasson; Juan F Orueta Medía
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.234

5.  How much does care in palliative care wards cost in Poland?

Authors:  Aleksandra D Ciałkowska-Rysz; Wieslawa Pokropska; Jacek Łuczak; Anna Kaptacz; Andrzej Stachowiak; Krystyna Hurich; Monika Koszela
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.318

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.