Literature DB >> 16916007

Providing patients with reviews of evidence about COPD treatments: a controlled trial of outcomes.

M Harris1, B J Smith, A Veale, A Esterman, P A Frith, P Selim.   

Abstract

Studies in many countries have identified gaps between what is known from research evidence and what is done in clinical practice. Merely making research evidence available to practitioners does not cause much change in their behaviour, and researchers are now looking for more effective ways to improve the implementation of evidence. We report outcomes at three months of a parallel group trial of an evidence based patient manual designed to improve implementation of evidence by the patient's doctors. The patient manual was produced with extensive patient and professional input. It contained summaries of the evidence for treatments used in COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and prompted discussion of evidence with doctors. Participants in the intervention arm of the trial (n = 125) were supplied with the manual and participants in the control arm (n = 124) were supplied with a pamphlet about COPD produced by the Australian Lung Foundation. The primary outcome measure (rates of current influenza vaccination and bone density testing) was an indicator of evidence based management of COPD. Secondary outcomes were quality of life (mastery component), satisfaction with information, communication with usual doctor, and anxiety. At three months no pattern of benefit in outcome measures was found for either group. Process measures showed high levels of personal use of the manual but progression to conversations with doctors for fewer than half of participants, and little treatment change. The findings highlight the difficulties of promoting changes in health behaviour and show that even when all stakeholders are consulted success is not guaranteed. Further research is required to identify those patients most likely to use manuals such as the one reported here, and how to make patient mediated interventions more effective for a greater proportion of the target population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16916007     DOI: 10.1191/1479972306cd112oa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chron Respir Dis        ISSN: 1479-9723            Impact factor:   2.444


  5 in total

Review 1.  Self-management interventions including action plans for exacerbations versus usual care in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Anke Lenferink; Marjolein Brusse-Keizer; Paul Dlpm van der Valk; Peter A Frith; Marlies Zwerink; Evelyn M Monninkhof; Job van der Palen; Tanja W Effing
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-04

2.  Pulmonary rehabilitation: overwhelming evidence but lost in translation?

Authors:  Kylie Johnston; Karen Grimmer-Somers
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 3.  Improving the uptake of systematic reviews: a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and relevance.

Authors:  John Wallace; Charles Byrne; Mike Clarke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  The design of behavioural interventions labelled as patient-mediated: A scoping review.

Authors:  Jeremy Y Ng; Anna R Gagliardi
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  [Perceptions of patients and health professionals about the quality of care provided to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients].

Authors:  Elena Tambo-Lizalde; José Miguel Carrasco-Gimeno; Susana Mayoral-Blasco; María José Rabanaque-Hernández; José María Abad-Díez
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 1.137

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.