Literature DB >> 16915091

Three-dimensional in vivo measurement of lumbar spine segmental motion.

Ruth S Ochia1, Nozomu Inoue, Susan M Renner, Eric P Lorenz, Tae-Hong Lim, Gunnar B J Andersson, Howard S An.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Fifteen asymptomatic volunteers were externally rotated and CT scanned to determine lumbar segmental motion.
OBJECTIVES: To measure three-dimensional segmental motion in vivo using a noninvasive measurement technique. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal instability has been implicated as a potential cause of low back pain, especially, axial rotational instability. Typically, flexion-extension lateral radiographs were used to quantify instability, but inaccurately measured translations and inability to capture out-of-plane rotations are limitations.
METHODS: Using a custom-calibrated rotation jig, L1-S1 CT reconstructions were created of volunteers in each of 3 positions: supine and left and right rotations of the torso with respect to the hips. Segmental motions were calculated using Euler angles and volume merge methods in three major planes.
RESULTS: Segmental motions were small (< 4 degrees or 6 mm) with the greatest motions seen in axial rotation (range, 0.6 degrees to 2.2 degrees ), lateral bending (range, -3.6 degrees to 3.0 degrees ), and frontal translation (-1.2 mm to 5.4 mm). Largest motions were in the levels: L1-L2 to L3-L4.
CONCLUSIONS: Complex coupled motions were measured due to external torsion and could be indicative of instability chronic patients with low back pain. The presented data provide baseline segmental motions for future comparisons to symptomatic subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16915091     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000231435.55842.9e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  40 in total

1.  Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the cervical spine after anterior cervical decompression and fusion at an adjacent level: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Sadayoshi Watanabe; Nozomu Inoue; Tomonori Yamaguchi; Yoshitaka Hirano; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Shintaro Nishida; Yuichi Hirose; Junichi Mizuno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Plane of vertebral movement eliciting muscle lengthening history in the low back influences the decrease in muscle spindle responsiveness of the cat.

Authors:  Weiqing Ge; Dong-Yuan Cao; Cynthia R Long; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-09-29

3.  Clinical application of a handy intraoperative measurement device for lumbar segmental instability.

Authors:  Yuichi Kasai; Tadashi Inaba; Takaya Kato; Koji Akeda; Atsumasa Uchida
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Segmental in vivo vertebral motion during functional human lumbar spine activities.

Authors:  Guoan Li; Shaobai Wang; Peter Passias; Qun Xia; Gang Li; Kirkham Wood
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Thoracolumbar fascia does not influence proprioceptive signaling from lumbar paraspinal muscle spindles in the cat.

Authors:  Dong-Yuan Cao; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  In vivo range of motion of the lumbar spinous processes.

Authors:  Qun Xia; Shaobai Wang; Peter G Passias; Michal Kozanek; Gang Li; Brian E Grottkau; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Effects of Axial Torsion on Disc Height Distribution: An In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Nicole M Mammoser; John J Triano; Howard S An; Gunnar B J Andersson; Nozomu Inoue
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 1.437

8.  Three-dimensional movements of the lumbar spine facet joints and segmental movements: in vivo examinations of normal subjects with a new non-invasive method.

Authors:  P Svedmark; T Tullberg; M E Noz; G Q Maguire; M P Zeleznik; L Weidenhielm; G Nemeth; H Olivecrona
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Parameters that effect spine biomechanics following cervical disc replacement.

Authors:  Vijay K Goel; Ahmad Faizan; Vivek Palepu; Sanghita Bhattacharya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Intervertebral disc degeneration: biological and biomechanical factors.

Authors:  Howard S An; Koichi Masuda; Nozomu Inoue
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.601

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.