Literature DB >> 16914171

Protecting genomic integrity in somatic cells and embryonic stem cells.

Y Hong1, R B Cervantes, E Tichy, J A Tischfield, P J Stambrook.   

Abstract

Mutation frequencies at some loci in mammalian somatic cells in vivo approach 10(-4). The majority of these events occur as a consequence of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) due to mitotic recombination. Such high levels of DNA damage in somatic cells, which can accumulate with age, will cause injury and, after a latency period, may lead to somatic disease and ultimately death. This high level of DNA damage is untenable for germ cells, and by extrapolation for embryonic stem (ES) cells, that must recreate the organism. ES cells cannot tolerate such a high frequency of damage since mutations will immediately impact the altered cell, and subsequently the entire organism. Most importantly, the mutations may be passed on to future generations. ES cells, therefore, must have robust mechanisms to protect the integrity of their genomes. We have examined two such mechanisms. Firstly, we have shown that mutation frequencies and frequencies of mitotic recombination in ES cells are about 100-fold lower than in adult somatic cells or in isogenic mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs). A second complementary protective mechanism eliminates those ES cells that have acquired a mutational burden, thereby maintaining a pristine population. Consistent with this hypothesis, ES cells lack a G1 checkpoint, and the two known signaling pathways that mediate the checkpoint are compromised. The checkpoint kinase, Chk2, which participates in both pathways is sequestered at centrosomes in ES cells and does not phosphorylate its substrates (i.e. p53 and Cdc25A) that must be modified to produce a G1 arrest. Ectopic expression of Chk2 does not rescue the p53-mediated pathway, but does restore the pathway mediated by Cdc25A. Wild type ES cells exposed to ionizing radiation do not accumulate in G1 but do so in S-phase and in G2. ES cells that ectopically express Chk2 undergo cell cycle arrest in G1 as well as G2, and appear to be protected from apoptosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16914171     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2006.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  45 in total

1.  Terminally differentiated astrocytes lack DNA damage response signaling and are radioresistant but retain DNA repair proficiency.

Authors:  L Schneider; M Fumagalli; F d'Adda di Fagagna
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 15.828

2.  Homologous recombination conserves DNA sequence integrity throughout the cell cycle in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Lourdes Serrano; Li Liang; Yiming Chang; Li Deng; Christopher Maulion; Son Nguyen; Jay A Tischfield
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 3.272

3.  Centrosomal Chk2 in DNA damage responses and cell cycle progression.

Authors:  Amnon Golan; Elah Pick; Lyuben Tsvetkov; Yasmine Nadler; Harriet Kluger; David F Stern
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Can an iPS cell secure its genomic fidelity?

Authors:  R Sarig; V Rotter
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 15.828

5.  Mutation frequency dynamics in HPRT locus in culture-adapted human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells correspond to their differentiated counterparts.

Authors:  Miriama Krutá; Monika Šeneklová; Jan Raška; Anton Salykin; Lenka Zerzánková; Martin Pešl; Eva Bártová; Michal Franek; Aneta Baumeisterová; Stanislava Košková; Kai J Neelsen; Aleš Hampl; Petr Dvořák; Vladimír Rotrekl
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.272

6.  Human embryonic stem cells have enhanced repair of multiple forms of DNA damage.

Authors:  Scott Maynard; Anna Maria Swistowska; Jae Wan Lee; Ying Liu; Su-Ting Liu; Alexandre Bettencourt Da Cruz; Mahendra Rao; Nadja C de Souza-Pinto; Xianmin Zeng; Vilhelm A Bohr
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 6.277

7.  Condensin complexes regulate mitotic progression and interphase chromatin structure in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Thomas G Fazzio; Barbara Panning
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 8.  The bright and the dark sides of DNA repair in stem cells.

Authors:  Guido Frosina
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-04-08

9.  The FunGenES database: a genomics resource for mouse embryonic stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Herbert Schulz; Raivo Kolde; Priit Adler; Irène Aksoy; Konstantinos Anastassiadis; Michael Bader; Nathalie Billon; Hélène Boeuf; Pierre-Yves Bourillot; Frank Buchholz; Christian Dani; Michael Xavier Doss; Lesley Forrester; Murielle Gitton; Domingos Henrique; Jürgen Hescheler; Heinz Himmelbauer; Norbert Hübner; Efthimia Karantzali; Androniki Kretsovali; Sandra Lubitz; Laurent Pradier; Meena Rai; Jüri Reimand; Alexandra Rolletschek; Agapios Sachinidis; Pierre Savatier; Francis Stewart; Mike P Storm; Marina Trouillas; Jaak Vilo; Melanie J Welham; Johannes Winkler; Anna M Wobus; Antonis K Hatzopoulos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  DNA damage mediated s and g(2) checkpoints in human embryonal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  XiaoQi Wang; Vincent C H Lui; Ronnie T P Poon; Ping Lu; Randy Y C Poon
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.