Literature DB >> 16911879

Comparison of methylene blue-directed biopsies and four-quadrant biopsies in the detection of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and early cancer in Barrett's oesophagus.

L Gossner1, O Pech, A May, M Vieth, M Stolte, C Ell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Barrett's oesophagus embodies the risk of malignant transformation. High-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and early cancer in Barrett's oesophagus are often discrete or macroscopically occult lesions and show a patchy distribution and therefore, directed biopsies in combination with four-quadrant random biopsies are the gold standard for surveillance. AIMS: The aim of this prospective study was to compare methylene blue staining and random biopsies in patients with early Barrett's neoplasia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients (mean age 65+/-8 years) with histologically proven but macroscopically in evident high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (n=17) or early cancer in Barrett's oesophagus (n=69) on HR-endoscopy with all together 98 lesions, were included. In the first step, four-quadrant random biopsies were taken during routine endoscopy (group I). In a second step, staining was performed with a 0.5% solution of methylene blue with a spray catheter. Biopsies of focal areas with decreased stain, heterogeneity of stain or absence stain were taken (group II).
RESULTS: In 75/86 patients, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or early cancer in Barrett's oesophagus could be diagnosed in the methylene blue group while 56 patients were determined in the random biopsies group (P=0.053). High-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or early cancer was diagnosed in significantly more methylene blue-directed biopsies (80.9% versus 26.4%, P<0.005) and also significantly more lesions could be identified in the methylene blue group (96/98; 98%) while in the random biopsies group only 58/98 lesions (59%) could be localised (P<0.05). When methylene blue was used (1217 versus 562, P<0.0001), the average number of specimens taken with methylene blue per patient was about half of that with random biopsy (6.5 versus 14.1, P<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Chromoendoscopy with methylene blue diagnosed significantly more patients and lesions with intraepithelial neoplasia or early cancer in Barrett's oesophagus compared to random biopsies. In addition, significantly less biopsies were needed with methylene blue compared to random biopsies. The use of methylene blue-directed biopsies appears to improve the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia and early cancer in Barrett's oesophagus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16911879     DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2006.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Liver Dis        ISSN: 1590-8658            Impact factor:   4.088


  9 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic resection of early oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Oliver Pech; Andrea May; Thomas Rabenstein; Christian Ell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Barrett esophagus: histology and pathology for the clinician.

Authors:  Robert D Odze
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 3.  Barrett's esophagus in 2016: From pathophysiology to treatment.

Authors:  Irene Martinucci; Nicola de Bortoli; Salvatore Russo; Lorenzo Bertani; Manuele Furnari; Anna Mokrowiecka; Ewa Malecka-Panas; Vincenzo Savarino; Edoardo Savarino; Santino Marchi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-05-06

Review 4.  Endoscopic evaluation and advanced imaging of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Kenneth K Wang; Ngozi Okoro; Ganapathy Prasad; Michel WongKeeSong; Navtej S Buttar; Jianmin Tian
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2011-01

Review 5.  Endoscopic assessment and management of early esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ghassan M Hammoud; Hazem Hammad; Jamal A Ibdah
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-08-15

Review 6.  Advanced imaging technologies increase detection of dysplasia and neoplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Bashar J Qumseya; Haibo Wang; Nicole Badie; Rosemary N Uzomba; Sravanthi Parasa; Donna L White; Herbert Wolfsen; Prateek Sharma; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 7.  Role of endoscopy in early oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Jayan Mannath; Krish Ragunath
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 46.802

8.  Confocal endomicroscopy (CEM) improves efficiency of Barrett surveillance.

Authors:  Vien X Nguyen; Cuong C Nguyen; Giovanni De Petris; Virender K Sharma; Ananya Das
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-01

Review 9.  Advances in the management of Barrett's esophagus and early esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ajaypal Singh; Amitabh Chak
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2015-10-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.