Literature DB >> 16911438

Becoming literate in different languages: similar problems, different solutions.

Johannes C Ziegler1, Usha Goswami.   

Abstract

The teaching of reading in different languages should be informed by an effective evidence base. Although most children will eventually become competent, indeed skilled, readers of their languages, the pre-reading (e.g. phonological awareness) and language skills that they bring to school may differ in systematic ways for different language environments. A thorough understanding of potential differences is required if literacy teaching is to be optimized in different languages. Here we propose a theoretical framework based on a psycholinguistic grain size approach to guide the collection of evidence in different countries. We argue that the development of reading depends on children's phonological awareness in all languages studied to date. However, we propose that because languages vary in the consistency with which phonology is represented in orthography, there are developmental differences in the grain size of lexical representations, and accompanying differences in developmental reading strategies across orthographies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16911438     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00509.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  32 in total

1.  The role of the phonological loop in English word learning: a comparison of Chinese ESL learners and native speakers.

Authors:  Megumi Hamada; Keiko Koda
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2011-04

2.  Bilingual Phonological Awareness: Construct Validation in Grade 1 Spanish-Speaking English Learners.

Authors:  Shiva Khalaf; Kristi L Santi; Paulina A Kulesz; Ferenc Bunta; David J Francis
Journal:  New Dir Child Adolesc Dev       Date:  2019-07-01

3.  The importance of vowel diacritics for the temporary retention of high and low frequency Hebrew words of varying syllabic length.

Authors:  Vered Vaknin-Nusbaum; Paul Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

4.  Lexical decision as an endophenotype for reading comprehension: an exploration of an association.

Authors:  Adam Naples; Len Katz; Elena L Grigorenko
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2012-11

5.  Neurobiological signatures of L2 proficiency: Evidence from a bi-directional cross-linguistic study.

Authors:  Henry Brice; William Einar Mencl; Stephen J Frost; Atira Sara Bick; Jay G Rueckl; Kenneth R Pugh; Ram Frost
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 1.710

6.  Educational Neuroscience: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  P N Tandon; Nandini Chatterjee Singh
Journal:  Ann Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-07

7.  Using Artificial Orthographies for Studying Cross-Linguistic Differences in the Cognitive and Neural Profiles of Reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hirshorn; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 1.710

8.  Phonemes matter: the role of phoneme-level awareness in emergent Chinese readers.

Authors:  Ellen Hamilton Newman; Twila Tardif; Jingyuan Huang; Hua Shu
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2010-10-25

9.  Reading fluency and speech perception speed of beginning readers with persistent reading problems: the perception of initial stop consonants and consonant clusters.

Authors:  Patrick Snellings; Aryan van der Leij; Henk Blok; Peter F de Jong
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  2010-07-22

10.  Language Disorders in Multilingual and Multicultural Populations.

Authors:  Mira Goral; Peggy S Conner
Journal:  Annu Rev Appl Linguist       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.