Literature DB >> 16910936

Microbiological study of cosmetic products during their use by consumers: health risk and efficacy of preservative systems.

R Campana1, C Scesa, V Patrone, E Vittoria, W Baffone.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the microbial contamination of 91 cosmetics (23 o/w emulsions, 47 tensiolytes, 21 aqueous pastes) in three different states of use (intact, in-use, ending product) and the protection efficacy of the preservative systems most frequently used in the analysed cosmetic formulations. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Total bacterial count, isolation and identification of pathogenic isolates were performed on the collected cosmetics. About 10.6% of tensiolytes (13.5% bath foam, 6.7% shampoo, 10% liquid soaps) were contaminated by Staphylococcus warneri, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas putida. The efficacy of the preservative systems of two cosmetic products, tested against standard micro-organisms (Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 4338 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 9027) and two isolates from cosmetics in this study (S. epidermidis and P. putida), satisfied the Cosmetics, Toiletries, and Fragrance Association and Official Italian Pharmacopeia criteria, while only one tested cosmetic respected the Rapid Challenge Test criterion.
CONCLUSIONS: Contaminated cosmetic products are relatively uncommon, but some products, unable to suppress the growth of several micro-organisms, represent a potential health hazard. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The challenge test may be performed not only during the preparation of the preservative system in the intact cosmetics, but also be used to evaluate the protection efficacy during their use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16910936     DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.01952.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0266-8254            Impact factor:   2.858


  9 in total

1.  Post-consumer use efficacies of preservatives in personal care and topical drug products: relationship to preservative category.

Authors:  Timothy D Ravita; Ralph S Tanner; Donald G Ahearn; Erin L Arms; Patrick W Crockett
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Rubus rosaefolius extract as a natural preservative candidate in topical formulations.

Authors:  Elissa Arantes Ostrosky; Elda Maria Cecilio Marcondes; Suzana de Oliveira Nishikawa; Patricia Santos Lopes; Gustavo Henrique Costa Varca; Terezinha de Jesus Andreoli Pinto; T Vladi Olga Consiglieri; Andre Rolim Baby; Maria Valéria Robles Velasco; Telma Mary Kaneko
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 3.  Improving aseptic injection standards in aesthetic clinical practice.

Authors:  Rachna Murthy; David Eccleston; Darren Mckeown; Apul Parikh; Sophie Shotter
Journal:  Dermatol Ther       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.851

Review 4.  Allergy to selected cosmetic ingredients.

Authors:  Wioletta A Zukiewicz-Sobczak; Piotr Adamczuk; Paula Wróblewska; Jacek Zwoliński; Jolanta Chmielewska-Badora; Ewelina Krasowska; Elżbieta M Galińska; Grażyna Cholewa; Jacek Piątek; Jacek Koźlik
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Effectiveness of five antidandruff cosmetic formulations against planktonic cells and biofilms of dermatophytes.

Authors:  Renan Martins Dos Santos; Marcus Vinícius Dias-Souza
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Rapid assessment and prediction of the efficiency of two preservatives against S. aureus in cosmetic products using High Content Screening-Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy.

Authors:  Samia Almoughrabie; Chrisse Ngari; Laurent Guillier; Romain Briandet; Valérie Poulet; Florence Dubois-Brissonnet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Safe usage of cosmetics in Bangladesh: a quality perspective based on microbiological attributes.

Authors:  Rashed Noor; Nagma Zerin; Kamal Kanta Das; Luthfun Naher Nitu
Journal:  J Biol Res (Thessalon)       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Microbiological testing of pharmaceuticals and cosmetics in Egypt.

Authors:  Hend Zeitoun; Mervat Kassem; Dina Raafat; Hamida AbouShlieb; Nourhan Fanaki
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.605

9.  The use of unirradiated and γ-irradiated zinc oxide nanoparticles as a preservative in cosmetic preparations.

Authors:  Alaa El-Dien Ms Hosny; Mona T Kashef; Hadeer A Taher; Zeinab E El-Bazza
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-09-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.