| Literature DB >> 21643865 |
Elissa Arantes Ostrosky1, Elda Maria Cecilio Marcondes, Suzana de Oliveira Nishikawa, Patricia Santos Lopes, Gustavo Henrique Costa Varca, Terezinha de Jesus Andreoli Pinto, T Vladi Olga Consiglieri, Andre Rolim Baby, Maria Valéria Robles Velasco, Telma Mary Kaneko.
Abstract
Even though the synthetic preservatives may offer a high antimicrobial efficacy, they are commonly related to adverse reactions and regarded as having potentially harmful effects caused by chronic consumption. The development of natural preservatives provides a way of reducing the amount of synthetic preservatives normally used in pharmaceutical and cosmetic preparations. In addition, these agents have less toxic effects and represent a possible natural and safer alternative of the preservatives. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the Rubus rosaefolius Smith extract efficiency as a natural preservative in base formulations. Of the extract, 0.2% (w/w) was assayed for its effectiveness of antimicrobial protection in two different base formulations (emulsion and gel). The microbial challenge test was performed following the standard procedures proposed by The United States Pharmacopoeia 33nd, European Pharmacopoeia 6th, Japanese Pharmacopoeia 15th, and the Cosmetics, Toiletries, and Fragrance Association using standardized microorganisms. The results demonstrated that R. rosaefolius extract at the studied concentration reduced the bacterial inocula, satisfying the criterion in all formulations, even though it was not able to present an effective preservative behavior against fungi. Thus, the investigation of new natural substances with preservative properties that could be applied in pharmaceutical and cosmetic products is relevant due to the possibility of substituting or decreasing the concentration of synthetic preservatives, providing a way for the development of safer formulas for the use of consumers.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21643865 PMCID: PMC3134679 DOI: 10.1208/s12249-011-9635-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AAPS PharmSciTech ISSN: 1530-9932 Impact factor: 3.246