Literature DB >> 16909975

Can dose reduction to one parotid gland prevent xerostomia?--A feasibility study for locally advanced head and neck cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

A K Anand1, J Jain, P S Negi, A R Chaudhoory, S N Sinha, P S Choudhury, R Kumar, R K Munjal.   

Abstract

AIMS: Dryness of the mouth is one of the most distressing chronic toxicities of radiation therapy in head and neck cancers. In this study, parotid function was assessed in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers undergoing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with or without chemotherapy. Parotid function was assessed with the help of a questionnaire and parotid scintigraphy, especially with regards to unilateral sparing of the parotid gland.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 19 patients were treated with compensator-based IMRT between February 2003 and March 2004. The dose to the clinical target volume ranged between 66 and 70 Gy in 30-35 fractions to 95% of the isodose volume. Ipsilateral high-risk neck nodes received an average dose of 60 Gy and the contralateral low-risk neck received a dose of 54-56 Gy. Eight of 19 patients also received concomitant chemotherapy.
RESULTS: Subjective toxicity to the parotid glands was assessed with the help of a questionnaire at 0, 3 and 6 months and objective toxicity was assessed with parotid scintigraphy at 0 and 3 months. The mean dose to the ipsilateral parotid gland ranged from 19.5 to 52.8 Gy (mean 33.14 Gy) and the mean dose to the contralateral gland was 11.1-46.6 Gy (mean 26.85 Gy). At a median follow-up of 13 months, 9/19 patients had no symptoms of dryness of the mouth (grade I), 8/19 had mild dryness of the mouth (grade II) and only 2/19 had grade III xerostomia, although the parotid gland could only be spared on one side in most of the patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Minimising the radiation dose to one of the parotid glands with the help of IMRT in patients with advanced head and neck cancers can prevent xerostomia in most patients and parotid scintigraphy is a useful method of documenting xerostomia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16909975     DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2006.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)        ISSN: 0936-6555            Impact factor:   4.126


  12 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies: management strategies and economic impact.

Authors:  S B Jensen; A M L Pedersen; A Vissink; E Andersen; C G Brown; A N Davies; J Dutilh; J S Fulton; L Jankovic; N N F Lopes; A L S Mello; L V Muniz; C A Murdoch-Kinch; R G Nair; J J Napeñas; A Nogueira-Rodrigues; D Saunders; B Stirling; I von Bültzingslöwen; D S Weikel; L S Elting; F K L Spijkervet; M T Brennan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Analyzing the performance of the planning system by use of AAPM TG 119 test cases.

Authors:  L Nithya; N Arunai Nambi Raj; Sasikumar Rathinamuthu; Manish Bhushan Pandey
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2015-07-04

3.  Submandibular gland sparing in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for N0-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  L Huang; W Zhang; T Zhuang; F Wu; D Li; M Zheng; B Lin; M Zhuang; Z Chen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Incorporating single-side sparing in models for predicting parotid dose sparing in head and neck IMRT.

Authors:  Lulin Yuan; Q Jackie Wu; Fang-Fang Yin; Yuliang Jiang; David Yoo; Yaorong Ge
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  A systematic review of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies: prevalence, severity and impact on quality of life.

Authors:  S B Jensen; A M L Pedersen; A Vissink; E Andersen; C G Brown; A N Davies; J Dutilh; J S Fulton; L Jankovic; N N F Lopes; A L S Mello; L V Muniz; C A Murdoch-Kinch; R G Nair; J J Napeñas; A Nogueira-Rodrigues; D Saunders; B Stirling; I von Bültzingslöwen; D S Weikel; L S Elting; F K L Spijkervet; M T Brennan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Predictors of poor sleep quality among head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Andrew G Shuman; Sonia A Duffy; David L Ronis; Susan L Garetz; Scott A McLean; Karen E Fowler; Jeffrey E Terrell
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Multi-institutional comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy vs. intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: a planning study.

Authors:  Andrea Holt; Dirk Van Gestel; Mark P Arends; Erik W Korevaar; Danny Schuring; Martina C Kunze-Busch; Rob Jw Louwe; Corine van Vliet-Vroegindeweij
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Feasibility of image-guided radiotherapy based on helical tomotherapy to reduce contralateral parotid dose in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Nam P Nguyen; Paul Vos; Vincent Vinh-Hung; Misty Ceizyk; Lexie Smith-Raymond; Michelle Stevie; Benjamin Slane; Alexander Chi; Anand Desai; Shane P Krafft; Siyoung Jang; Russ Hamilton; Ulf Karlsson; Dave Abraham
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Comparative analysis of volumetric-modulated arc therapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for base of tongue cancer.

Authors:  L Nithya; N Arunai Nambi Raj; Arulraj Kumar; Sasikumar Rathinamuthu; Manish Bhushan Pandey
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2014-04

10.  Dosimetric differences in flattened and flattening filter-free beam treatment plans.

Authors:  Yue Yan; Poonam Yadav; Michael Bassetti; Kaifang Du; Daniel Saenz; Paul Harari; Bhudatt R Paliwal
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.