BACKGROUND: A single-institution Phase I clinical trial was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and define the safety profile of temozolomide and capecitabine when used in combination to treat brain metastases from breast cancer. METHODS: Patients were eligible if they had bidimensionally measurable supratentorial or infratentorial brain metastasis from histologically confirmed breast carcinoma. Patients could have received up to 3 prior chemotherapy regimens. Temozolomide and capecitabine were administered concomitantly to 4 sequential cohorts at different dosing levels on Days 1-5 and Days 8-12, with cycles repeated every 21 days until disease progression. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with multiple brain lesions were treated, including 14 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases and 10 patients with recurrent brain metastases. Only 1 patient was chemotherapy-naive. Fatigue and nausea were the most commonly observed toxicities observed at any dose levels. Significant antitumor activity was observed, with a total of 1 complete and 3 partial responses (18% objective response rate) in the brain. The median response duration was 8 weeks (range, 6-64 weeks) and the median time to progression in the brain was 12 weeks (range, 3-70 weeks). Neurocognitive function improved or remained stable in patients with a response or stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of temozolomide and capecitabine is an active, well-tolerated regimen. The observed antitumor activity warrants further evaluation of this combination as an alternative to or in combination with whole-brain radiation therapy for the treatment of multiple brain metastases. (c) 2006 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: A single-institution Phase I clinical trial was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and define the safety profile of temozolomide and capecitabine when used in combination to treat brain metastases from breast cancer. METHODS:Patients were eligible if they had bidimensionally measurable supratentorial or infratentorial brain metastasis from histologically confirmed breast carcinoma. Patients could have received up to 3 prior chemotherapy regimens. Temozolomide and capecitabine were administered concomitantly to 4 sequential cohorts at different dosing levels on Days 1-5 and Days 8-12, with cycles repeated every 21 days until disease progression. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with multiple brain lesions were treated, including 14 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases and 10 patients with recurrent brain metastases. Only 1 patient was chemotherapy-naive. Fatigue and nausea were the most commonly observed toxicities observed at any dose levels. Significant antitumor activity was observed, with a total of 1 complete and 3 partial responses (18% objective response rate) in the brain. The median response duration was 8 weeks (range, 6-64 weeks) and the median time to progression in the brain was 12 weeks (range, 3-70 weeks). Neurocognitive function improved or remained stable in patients with a response or stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of temozolomide and capecitabine is an active, well-tolerated regimen. The observed antitumor activity warrants further evaluation of this combination as an alternative to or in combination with whole-brain radiation therapy for the treatment of multiple brain metastases. (c) 2006 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Louis Burt Nabors; Mario Ammirati; Philip J Bierman; Henry Brem; Nicholas Butowski; Marc C Chamberlain; Lisa M DeAngelis; Robert A Fenstermaker; Allan Friedman; Mark R Gilbert; Deneen Hesser; Matthias Holdhoff; Larry Junck; Ronald Lawson; Jay S Loeffler; Moshe H Maor; Paul L Moots; Tara Morrison; Maciej M Mrugala; Herbert B Newton; Jana Portnow; Jeffrey J Raizer; Lawrence Recht; Dennis C Shrieve; Allen K Sills; David Tran; Nam Tran; Frank D Vrionis; Patrick Y Wen; Nicole McMillian; Maria Ho Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2013-09-01 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Carlos Kamiya-Matsuoka; David Cachia; Steven G Waguespack; Christopher H Crane; Anita Mahajan; Paul D Brown; Joo Yeon Nam; Ian E McCutcheon; Marta Penas-Prado Journal: Pituitary Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 4.107
Authors: Taofeek K Owonikoko; Jack Arbiser; Amelia Zelnak; Hui-Kuo G Shu; Hyunsuk Shim; Adam M Robin; Steven N Kalkanis; Timothy G Whitsett; Bodour Salhia; Nhan L Tran; Timothy Ryken; Michael K Moore; Kathleen M Egan; Jeffrey J Olson Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Diane Palmieri; Renata Duchnowska; Stephan Woditschka; Emily Hua; Yongzhen Qian; Wojciech Biernat; Katarzyna Sosińska-Mielcarek; Brunilde Gril; Andreas M Stark; Stephen M Hewitt; David J Liewehr; Seth M Steinberg; Jacek Jassem; Patricia S Steeg Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-03-14 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Chris E Adkins; Mohamed I Nounou; Rajendar K Mittapalli; Tori B Terrell-Hall; Afroz S Mohammad; Rajaganapathi Jagannathan; Paul R Lockman Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2014-10-27
Authors: Marie S Thearle; Pamela U Freda; Jeffrey N Bruce; Steven R Isaacson; Yoomi Lee; Robert L Fine Journal: Pituitary Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 4.107
Authors: Jeffrey J Olson; Nina A Paleologos; Laurie E Gaspar; Paula D Robinson; Rachel E Morris; Mario Ammirati; David W Andrews; Anthony L Asher; Stuart H Burri; Charles S Cobbs; Douglas Kondziolka; Mark E Linskey; Jay S Loeffler; Michael McDermott; Minesh P Mehta; Tom Mikkelsen; Roy A Patchell; Timothy C Ryken; Steven N Kalkanis Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2009-12-03 Impact factor: 4.130