Literature DB >> 16908585

Pain response in the first trimester after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with or without bone marrow edema.

M H J Voormolen1, W J van Rooij, M Sluzewski, Y van der Graaf, L E H Lampmann, P N M Lohle, J R Juttmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Presence of bone marrow edema (BME) in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCF) detected by MR imaging as selection criterion for percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) is speculative. To clarify significance of BME in VCF, we assessed pain response after PV in patients with VCF with full BME versus patients with VCF with absent BME.
METHODS: From a cohort of patients with painful VCF selected for PV, pain response in 14 patients with absent BME in VCF was prospectively compared with pain response in 31 patients with full BME in VCF. Pain was evaluated before PV and at 1 and 3 months after PV with visual analog scores and analgesics used. Back pain in general and at treated vertebral levels was assessed.
RESULTS: Pain decrease after PV at treated levels was observed in 10 (71%) patients with absent BME in VCF at both follow-up periods and in 29 (94%) patients with full BME 1 month after PV and 30 (97%) at 3 months after PV. Differences between the groups were significant (P = .04 at 1 month; P = .01 at 3 months). Pain response was not affected by other patient or imaging characteristics. General back pain after PV was comparable in both groups after PV (P = .08 at 1 month; P = .4 at 3 months).
CONCLUSION: Pain decrease after PV in patients with VCF is more frequently observed when full BME is present. Because 71% of patients with VCF with absent BME responded favorably on pain, PV should not be withheld based on absence of BME alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16908585      PMCID: PMC7977523     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  13 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  David F Kallmes; Mary E Jensen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  MR appearance at different ages of osteoporotic compression fractures of the vertebrae.

Authors:  M Yamato; G Nishimura; E Kuramochi; N Saiki; M Fujioka
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct

3.  Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging.

Authors:  M T Modic; P M Steinberg; J S Ross; T J Masaryk; J R Carter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Measurement of pain.

Authors:  E C Huskisson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-11-09       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Age of fracture and clinical outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  T J Kaufmann; M E Jensen; P A Schweickert; W F Marx; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of patients for percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  H M Do
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-08

7.  Correlation between preprocedural MRI findings and clinical outcomes in the treatment of chronic symptomatic vertebral compression fractures with percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel B Brown; Craig B Glaiberman; Louis A Gilula; Joshua S Shimony
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Benign versus pathologic compression fractures of vertebral bodies: assessment with conventional spin-echo, chemical-shift, and STIR MR imaging.

Authors:  L L Baker; S B Goodman; I Perkash; B Lane; D R Enzmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique.

Authors:  H K Genant; C Y Wu; C van Kuijk; M C Nevitt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 10.  Optimizing patient selection in percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  M J Bernadette Stallmeyer; Gregg H Zoarski; Abraham M Obuchowski
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.464

View more
  13 in total

1.  Is there really no benefit of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ming-Min Shi; Xun-Zi Cai; Tiao Lin; Wei Wang; Shi-Gui Yan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Vertebral endplate signal changes (Modic change): a systematic literature review of prevalence and association with non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Tue Secher Jensen; Jaro Karppinen; Joan S Sorensen; Jaakko Niinimäki; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Is intervertebral cement leakage a risk factor for new adjacent vertebral collapse?

Authors:  Anchalee Churojana; Dittapong Songsaeng; Rujimas Khumtong; Anek Suwanbundit; Guillaume Saliou
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 1.610

4.  Letter to the editor: Is there really no benefit of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  David S Jevsevar; Stephen I Esses; Deborah S Cummins
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Are Non-contrast MR Images enough for Detection of Fracture Levels Prior to Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in Patients with Osteoporosis?

Authors:  Wei Hsin Yuan; Michael Mu Huo Teng; Hui Chen Hsu; Ying Chou Sun; Cheng Yen Chang
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-01-02       Impact factor: 1.610

6.  Administration of conscious sedation by a neuroradiology team during percutaneous vertebroplasty and spinal biopsy procedures.

Authors:  Gianni De Berti; Massimo Maggi; Rita Conigliaro; Gabriele Levrini; Sandro Salzano; Reza Ghadirpour; Franco Servadei
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Bioceramic vertebral augmentation with a calcium sulphate/hydroxyapatite composite (Cerament SpineSupport): in vertebral compression fractures due to osteoporosis.

Authors:  Michael Rauschmann; Thomas Vogl; Akhil Verheyden; Robert Pflugmacher; Thomas Werba; Sven Schmidt; Johannes Hierholzer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Preprocedural MR imaging for percutaneous vertebroplasty: special interest in contrast enhancement.

Authors:  Akihiro Uemura; Nobuo Kobayashi; Yuji Numaguchi; Sokun Fuwa; Yukihisa Saida
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-08-27

9.  Prediction of immediate and long-term benefit after kyphoplasty of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures by preoperative MRI.

Authors:  I A Grafe; G Nöldge; C Weiss; M Libicher; M Baier; P Nawroth; P-J Meeder; B Wiedenhöfer; C Kasperk
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.693

10.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  Rachelle Buchbinder; Renea V Johnston; Kobi J Rischin; Joanne Homik; C Allyson Jones; Kamran Golmohammadi; David F Kallmes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.