STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess whether HIV RNA levels (log(10) scale) in highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) treated population have a bimodal distribution, suggesting optimal or suboptimal response to HAART. METHODS: The study population from two ongoing cohort studies comprised 564 men (4785 person visits) and 1173 women (8675 person visits) with known dates of HAART initiation and with HIV RNA measurements before and after initiation. Values below detection limit of assays were treated in the analysis as left censored. Maximum likelihood methods were used to estimate parameters and to determine possible bimodality of HIV RNA distributions. RESULTS: A two component mixture model fitted HIV RNA levels significantly better than did a single component distribution at different years from HAART initiation in both therapy experienced and therapy naive patients. In the fifth year after HAART initiation, 32% of men and 44% of women had HIV RNA in the higher component with medians of 5247 and 9253 copies/ml, respectively, suggesting suboptimal virological response to HAART, which was associated with poor adherence and lower frequency of CCR5 heterozygous genotype. CONCLUSION: The bimodal distribution of HIV RNA persisted during the years after HAART initiation. The high occurrence of suboptimal virological response at the fifth year after HAART initiation underscore the needs for careful monitoring and patient education about the importance of treatment adherence. This data analysis overcomes limitations of measurement techniques of observations having values below detection limits and serves to characterise the dynamics of the virological response to therapies.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess whether HIV RNA levels (log(10) scale) in highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) treated population have a bimodal distribution, suggesting optimal or suboptimal response to HAART. METHODS: The study population from two ongoing cohort studies comprised 564 men (4785 person visits) and 1173 women (8675 person visits) with known dates of HAART initiation and with HIV RNA measurements before and after initiation. Values below detection limit of assays were treated in the analysis as left censored. Maximum likelihood methods were used to estimate parameters and to determine possible bimodality of HIV RNA distributions. RESULTS: A two component mixture model fitted HIV RNA levels significantly better than did a single component distribution at different years from HAART initiation in both therapy experienced and therapy naive patients. In the fifth year after HAART initiation, 32% of men and 44% of women had HIV RNA in the higher component with medians of 5247 and 9253 copies/ml, respectively, suggesting suboptimal virological response to HAART, which was associated with poor adherence and lower frequency of CCR5 heterozygous genotype. CONCLUSION: The bimodal distribution of HIV RNA persisted during the years after HAART initiation. The high occurrence of suboptimal virological response at the fifth year after HAART initiation underscore the needs for careful monitoring and patient education about the importance of treatment adherence. This data analysis overcomes limitations of measurement techniques of observations having values below detection limits and serves to characterise the dynamics of the virological response to therapies.
Authors: C Piketty; P Castiel; L Belec; D Batisse; A Si Mohamed; J Gilquin; G Gonzalez-Canali; D Jayle; M Karmochkine; L Weiss; J P Aboulker; M D Kazatchkine Journal: AIDS Date: 1998-05-07 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: B Ledergerber; M Egger; M Opravil; A Telenti; B Hirschel; M Battegay; P Vernazza; P Sudre; M Flepp; H Furrer; P Francioli; R Weber Journal: Lancet Date: 1999-03-13 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: B Yen-Lieberman; D Brambilla; B Jackson; J Bremer; R Coombs; M Cronin; S Herman; D Katzenstein; S Leung; H J Lin; P Palumbo; S Rasheed; J Todd; M Vahey; P Reichelderfer Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1996-11 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: F J Palella; K M Delaney; A C Moorman; M O Loveless; J Fuhrer; G A Satten; D J Aschman; S D Holmberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-03-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S E Barkan; S L Melnick; S Preston-Martin; K Weber; L A Kalish; P Miotti; M Young; R Greenblatt; H Sacks; J Feldman Journal: Epidemiology Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Patrick M Tarwater; Joel E Gallant; John W Mellors; Mary E Gore; John P Phair; Roger Detels; Joseph B Margolick; Alvaro Muñoz Journal: AIDS Date: 2004-12-03 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: F W Wit; R van Leeuwen; G J Weverling; S Jurriaans; K Nauta; R Steingrover; J Schuijtemaker; X Eyssen; D Fortuin; M Weeda; F de Wolf; P Reiss; S A Danner; J M Lange Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: R Detels; A Muñoz; G McFarlane; L A Kingsley; J B Margolick; J Giorgi; L K Schrager; J P Phair Journal: JAMA Date: 1998-11-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: A d'Arminio Monforte; L Testa; F Adorni; E Chiesa; T Bini; G C Moscatelli; C Abeli; S Rusconi; S Sollima; C Balotta; M Musicco; M Galli; M Moroni Journal: AIDS Date: 1998-09-10 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Haitao Chu; Stephen J Gange; Xiuhong Li; Donald R Hoover; Chenglong Liu; Joan S Chmiel; Lisa P Jacobson Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Michael F Schneider; Joseph B Margolick; Lisa P Jacobson; Susheel Reddy; Otoniel Martinez-Maza; Alvaro Muñoz Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2012-04-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Xiuhong Li; Joseph B Margolick; Beth D Jamieson; Charles R Rinaldo; John P Phair; Lisa P Jacobson Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2011-08-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Patience Nyakato; Michael Schomaker; Nosisa Sipambo; Karl-Günter Technau; Geoffrey Fatti; Helena Rabie; Frank Tanser; Brian Eley; Jonathan Euvrard; Robin Wood; Priscilla R Tsondai; Constantin T Yiannoutsos; Morna Cornell; Mary-Ann Davies Journal: AIDS Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 4.632