| Literature DB >> 16905470 |
W K Al-Murrani1, A J Al-Rawi, M F Al-Hadithi, B Al-Tikriti.
Abstract
1. A stock of cross-bred CD hens was divided into 'resistant' (R) and 'sensitive' (S) to stress on the basis of the heterophil/lymphocyte (H/L) ratio using the lower 99% confidence limit method for selection. A first generation was produced from these R and S females mated with similarly selected R and S local Barred males. The association between 'resistance' and some production traits was investigated. 2. The proportions of R:S among CD females and Barred males was 51.2:48.8 and 52:48, respectively. Mean H/L ratios for Barred males and females, respectively, were 0.87 +/- 0.03 and 0.83 +/- 0.03 (P > 0.05). 3. Compared with the S group in CD females, the R group had greater egg production (59% vs 51%), egg weight (65.5 g vs 62.6 g) and body weight at 39 weeks (115 g heavier). 4. The superiority of R in terms of proportion of fertile eggs, hatchability and the proportion hatched from those set amounted to 4.8, 6.1 and 5.4%, respectively. 5. The proportion of dead embryos in the R group (5.4%) was lower than in the S group (9.3%). 6. With the F1 generation the R chicks were heavier at hatching. 7. Percentage mortality of male F1 chicks, from hatching to 4 weeks and from 4 to 8 weeks, was lower in the R group. A similar, but non-significant, trend was noted for R females. 8. The progeny of the R group was heavier than the S progeny at 4 and 8 weeks and also the percentage dressed weight of males was greater at 8 weeks. The R group was heavier than the S group at 4, 8 and 12 weeks. 9. These results suggest that selection for general 'resistance', on the basis of the H/L ratio using the 99% lower confidence limit method of selection, is positively correlated with several important production and reproduction traits. Establishing resistant lines with high production rates seems feasible.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16905470 DOI: 10.1080/00071660600829118
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br Poult Sci ISSN: 0007-1668 Impact factor: 2.095