Literature DB >> 16904697

The importance of subjectivity in perceptual errors on the emergence of indirect reciprocity.

Nobuyuki Takahashi1, Rie Mashima.   

Abstract

Indirect reciprocity is one mechanism that allows for unilateral resource giving among n-persons. Using analytical methods and computer simulations, previous studies have examined a number of strategies that make indirect reciprocity possible. In particular, previous investigations have concentrated on whether differentiating between justified and unjustified not-giving is important. However, whether or not a given strategy is ESS depends on the type of perceptual errors that are assumed. When errors are objective, regarding those who do not give to "bad" as "good" is critical. When perceptual errors are subjective, however, regarding those who give to "bad" as "bad" is critical. Since we believe that there is no guarantee that perceptual errors are shared among all individuals in a society, we argue that the latter moral principle may play a more important role in human interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16904697     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  15 in total

1.  The evolution of strongly-held group identities through agent-based cooperation.

Authors:  Roger M Whitaker; Gualtiero B Colombo; Yarrow Dunham
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  The complexity of human cooperation under indirect reciprocity.

Authors:  Fernando P Santos; Jorge M Pacheco; Francisco C Santos
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Indirect reciprocity under incomplete observation.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Naoki Masuda
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 4.  Moral assessment in indirect reciprocity.

Authors:  Karl Sigmund
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Groupwise information sharing promotes ingroup favoritism in indirect reciprocity.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Naoki Masuda
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Indirect reciprocity is sensitive to costs of information transfer.

Authors:  Shinsuke Suzuki; Hiromichi Kimura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Indirect reciprocity provides only a narrow margin of efficiency for costly punishment.

Authors:  Hisashi Ohtsuki; Yoh Iwasa; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Reputation Effects in Public and Private Interactions.

Authors:  Hisashi Ohtsuki; Yoh Iwasa; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Social Norms of Cooperation in Small-Scale Societies.

Authors:  Fernando P Santos; Francisco C Santos; Jorge M Pacheco
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  A Dominant Social Comparison Heuristic Unites Alternative Mechanisms for the Evolution of Indirect Reciprocity.

Authors:  Roger M Whitaker; Gualtiero B Colombo; Stuart M Allen; Robin I M Dunbar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.