Rekha T Tripathi1, Lance K Heilbrun, Vikash Jain, Ulka N Vaishampayan. 1. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine/Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Population studies have revealed that black Americans with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have a shorter survival than do white Americans. Differences in socioeconomic status and treatment are frequently cited as the reasons for this disparity. The effect of these social obstacles may be reduced by studying a patient population with advanced RCC enrolled in clinical trials, because patients in these trials are likely to be similar in terms of their access to care, compliance, and performance status. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients with metastatic RCC enrolled in clinical trials at Wayne State University from 1992 to 2002 was conducted. Log-rank survival analysis by age, sex, race, smoking history, nephrectomy history, prior therapy, type of protocol therapy (immunotherapy versus other), performance status (0 versus 1 to 2), and number of metastatic sites was conducted. Univariate and multivariate comparisons by race were performed for overall survival and time to progression. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients (median age 57 years) were enrolled; 21 (17%) were black and 101 (83%) were white. Overall survival was significantly shorter for the black Americans (P = 0.0027). The median survival for black Americans and white Americans was 6.9 and 11.5 months, respectively. On multivariate analysis, black race and performance status of 0 versus 1 and 2 were significant predictors of shorter survival. The presence of liver metastases and/or the absence of prior nephrectomy also influenced the length of overall survival through an interaction effect. CONCLUSIONS: Within a clinical trial patient population with RCC, race was a significant predictor of overall survival.
OBJECTIVES: Population studies have revealed that black Americans with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have a shorter survival than do white Americans. Differences in socioeconomic status and treatment are frequently cited as the reasons for this disparity. The effect of these social obstacles may be reduced by studying a patient population with advanced RCC enrolled in clinical trials, because patients in these trials are likely to be similar in terms of their access to care, compliance, and performance status. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients with metastatic RCC enrolled in clinical trials at Wayne State University from 1992 to 2002 was conducted. Log-rank survival analysis by age, sex, race, smoking history, nephrectomy history, prior therapy, type of protocol therapy (immunotherapy versus other), performance status (0 versus 1 to 2), and number of metastatic sites was conducted. Univariate and multivariate comparisons by race were performed for overall survival and time to progression. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients (median age 57 years) were enrolled; 21 (17%) were black and 101 (83%) were white. Overall survival was significantly shorter for the black Americans (P = 0.0027). The median survival for black Americans and white Americans was 6.9 and 11.5 months, respectively. On multivariate analysis, black race and performance status of 0 versus 1 and 2 were significant predictors of shorter survival. The presence of liver metastases and/or the absence of prior nephrectomy also influenced the length of overall survival through an interaction effect. CONCLUSIONS: Within a clinical trial patient population with RCC, race was a significant predictor of overall survival.
Authors: Parisa Tehranifar; Alfred I Neugut; Jo C Phelan; Bruce G Link; Yuyan Liao; Manisha Desai; Mary Beth Terry Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-09-29 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Tracy L Rose; Allison M Deal; Bhavani Krishnan; Matthew E Nielsen; Angela B Smith; William Y Kim; Matthew I Milowsky Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ulka Vaishampayan; Hema Vankayala; Fawn D Vigneau; William Quarshie; Brenda Dickow; Supraja Chalasani; Kendra Schwartz Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Date: 2013-09-28 Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Jie Lin; Shelia H Zahm; Craig D Shriver; Mark Purdue; Katherine A McGlynn; Kangmin Zhu Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2015-05-09 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Kang Su Cho; Young Deuk Choi; Se Joong Kim; Chun Il Kim; Byung Ha Chung; Do Hwan Seong; Dong Hyeon Lee; Jin Seon Cho; In Rae Cho; Sung Joon Hong Journal: Yonsei Med J Date: 2008-06-30 Impact factor: 2.759