OBJECTIVES: The incidence of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) is rising. To date, interleukin-2 (IL-2) is the only treatment offering a complete response rate for mRCC. We wish to test the hypothesis that the combination of restricted availability and expense associated with IL-2 administration results in differential access to the medication based on race and sex, despite similar clinical indications for its use. METHODS: We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program and the Centers for Medicare Services (CMS) to clinically characterize subjects with mRCC diagnosed from 1992 through 2002. We linked these subjects to claims identified in the CMS databases. We then assigned subjects to cohorts receiving radical nephrectomy, IL-2, both, or neither. A logistic model was created to identify factors that had significant independent effects on the receipt of IL-2. RESULTS: Three thousand seven hundred thirty individuals were identified with mRCC. After controlling for other variables, female subjects were less likely to receive IL-2 (O.R. 0.80). African American subjects were also less likely to receive IL-2 (O.R 0.55). Married individuals were much more likely to receive IL-2 (O.R 1.9). CONCLUSIONS: African Americans and women were much less likely to be treated with IL-2 after controlling for relevant clinical variables. These data document that the only therapy offering a complete response to patients with mRCC is less frequently given to those who are African American or female. It is possible that the racial and gender-based disparities in treatment with IL-2 will be replicated with newer, expensive treatment options for mRCC. Further prospective investigation into mitigating barriers to receipt of effective care for mRCC is urgently needed. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVES: The incidence of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) is rising. To date, interleukin-2 (IL-2) is the only treatment offering a complete response rate for mRCC. We wish to test the hypothesis that the combination of restricted availability and expense associated with IL-2 administration results in differential access to the medication based on race and sex, despite similar clinical indications for its use. METHODS: We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program and the Centers for Medicare Services (CMS) to clinically characterize subjects with mRCC diagnosed from 1992 through 2002. We linked these subjects to claims identified in the CMS databases. We then assigned subjects to cohorts receiving radical nephrectomy, IL-2, both, or neither. A logistic model was created to identify factors that had significant independent effects on the receipt of IL-2. RESULTS: Three thousand seven hundred thirty individuals were identified with mRCC. After controlling for other variables, female subjects were less likely to receive IL-2 (O.R. 0.80). African American subjects were also less likely to receive IL-2 (O.R 0.55). Married individuals were much more likely to receive IL-2 (O.R 1.9). CONCLUSIONS: African Americans and women were much less likely to be treated with IL-2 after controlling for relevant clinical variables. These data document that the only therapy offering a complete response to patients with mRCC is less frequently given to those who are African American or female. It is possible that the racial and gender-based disparities in treatment with IL-2 will be replicated with newer, expensive treatment options for mRCC. Further prospective investigation into mitigating barriers to receipt of effective care for mRCC is urgently needed. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Y Homma; K Kawabe; T Kitamura; Y Nishimura; M Shinohara; Y Kondo; I Saito; S Minowada; Y Asakage Journal: Int J Urol Date: 1995-05 Impact factor: 3.369
Authors: Christopher S Hollenbeak; Lucas E Nikkel; Eric W Schaefer; Evo Alemao; Nasrollah Ghahramani; Jay D Raman Journal: J Manag Care Pharm Date: 2011-10
Authors: Christopher B Allard; Francisco Gelpi-Hammerschmidt; Lauren C Harshman; Toni K Choueiri; Izak Faiena; Parth Modi; Benjamin I Chung; Ilker Tinay; Eric A Singer; Steven L Chang Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2015-07-22 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Karim Chamie; Nicholas M Donin; Pia Klöpfer; Paul Bevan; Barbara Fall; Olaf Wilhelm; Stephan Störkel; Jonathan Said; Michael Gambla; Robert E Hawkins; Gustavo Jankilevich; Anil Kapoor; Evgeny Kopyltsov; Michael Staehler; Kimmo Taari; Alberto J A Wainstein; Allan J Pantuck; Arie S Belldegrun Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Ruth P Norris; Rosie Dew; Linda Sharp; Alastair Greystoke; Stephen Rice; Kristina Johnell; Adam Todd Journal: BMC Med Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 8.775